All posts by Marcia D'Alton

Notes from a full meeting of Cork County Council, 13th January 2016

Notes from a meeting of the Full Council, 10th January, 2015.

[a]            CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
1.  Minutes of Meeting of the Council held on 14th December, 2014.

Proposed and seconded.

Amendment requested by Cllr D’Alton (Ind).  In the last meeting’s discussion on climate change, she did not say that climate change should be made part of the planning process.  Said that planning for climate change should become part of everything that we do.

 

[b]           VOTES OF SYMPATHY
2.  Votes of Sympathy (if any) to the relatives of:

  • members or employees of the Council,
  • dignitaries of Church or State, or
  • members of old I.R.A. and Cumann na mBan.

Votes of sympathy were expressed.

 

 

[c]            STATUTORY BUSINESS
3.  Disposal of Property – Section 183 of the Local Government Act, 2001:

Blarney Macroom Municipal District Meeting: 27th November, 2015

(a).       Disposal of 306 Cloughphilip, Tower, Blarney, Co. Cork.

(b).       Disposal of land at Kilnamuckey, Tower, Blarney, Co. Cork.

 

West Cork Municipal District, 7th December, 2015:

(c).          Disposal of land at Butlerstown, , Bandon, Co. Cork.

(d).          Disposal of No. 6 Casement Street, Clonakilty, Co. Cork.

(e).          Grant of Wayleaves at Durrus, Co. Cork.

 

Kanturk Mallow Municipal District Meetings:   4th December, 2015:

(f).           Disposal of property at Knockduff Upper, Cullen, Mallow, Co. Cork

 

East Cork Municipal District, December, 2015:

(g).          Disposal of property at Ballyvergan West, Youghal, Co. Cork.

(h).          Amendment to Disposal of land at Ballybearna, Ballinhassig, Co. Cork, by the substitution of “Wayleave measuring 81m x 5m and Right of Way measuring 81m x 5m” in lieu of “Wayleave measuring 76m x 5m and Right of Way measuring 76m x 5m”being the area of said property.

(i)             Amendment to Disposal of 51 Liam McGearailt Place, Fermoy, Co. Cork, by the substitution of No. 52 in lieu of No.51 being the area of said property .

Proposed and seconded. 

 

[e] CORRESPONDENCE FROM GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

Department of Communications, Energy & Natural Resources:
Letter dated 4th December, 2015, in response to Council’s letter of 14th July, 2015 regarding Whitegate refinery.

Correspondence from Dept of Env, Community & L.Gov

Cllr Buckley (SF): Very disappointed with the Minister’s response. This refinery underpins the local economy. It provides 600 jobs. Its loss would be a devastation to East Cork.

  

Department of Environment, Community and Local Government: Letter dated 15th December, 2015, in response to Council’s letter of 2015 regarding Income thresholds for social housing.

Correspondence from Dept of Env.

Noted.

 

Department of Environment, Community and Local Government: Letter dated 21st December, 2015, in response to Council’s letter of 21st November 2015 concerning global valuations of utilities undertaken by the Valuation Office.

Correspondence from Gov. Dep

Noted.

 

 

[d]           REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEES

The CE presented a report on recent flooding events.

Flood events doc

He went through the report briefly:

  • Met Eireann reported triple the normal rainfall in many parts of December. Wettest places were in County Cork. Roches Point reported its highest rainfall since 1955. Rainfall at Cork Airport was well higher than the normal 3 month average. We had three winter storms. The highest national 10 minute wind speed was recorded in Co. Cork at 102 km/h.
  • The response was effected by Severe Weather Assessment Team and Crisis Management Team. Convened 17 times between Dec 27th to Jan 2nd.
  • Cork County Council made contact with a lot of families in Midleton. Some families relocate on their own and don’t make contact with us but if families need help and ask for it, we help.
  • Commends community and voluntary effort.
  • 329 emergency calls in total were made to the fire emergency services.
  • Council staff worked over 4,000 days during the storms in December.
  • The Civil Defence was of tremendous help.
  • The Council extended the emergency phone line to 24 hours a day once Storm Frank hit. This received over 2,300 calls.
  • We don’t respond to comments on Facebook and Twitter as a Council. We are not interactive that way. But we used them for critical messaging. Updates on Facebook reached 150,000 followers.
  • Road assessment and restoration has commenced throughout the county.
  • €2.4m worth of damage was done during the storms in September 2015.
  • €7.4m worth of damage was done during the storms of 2012.
  • This event was far more wide-ranging with far greater impact than either of those events. The Department has asked us for an estimate of the damage. At this early stage, we reckon it will be €15 – 20m.
  • A formal request from government for details of particular roads and infrastructure to be restored is expected.
  • We opened our Civic Amenity Sites to take flood damaged goods.
  • We have asked consultants to advise on possible causes of flooding in MIdleton. This will be dealt with at Municipal District level.
  • Tenders for Bandon flood relief are in on 14th Tenders for Skibbereen will be opened at Council meeting on 8th February.
  • If there is an emergency, a local authority can do works on a stream or river. Inland Fisheries says it will facilitate emergency works. Cork County Council has consulted with Inland Fisheries Ireland and the current indication is that they would not regard dredging in Bandon as emergency works because there are planned schemes in place.
  • Some towns have flood committees, whereas others operate on an ad hoc basis. We will work with any of these. There is an opportunity to put these more structured committees in place as is the case in Skibbereen. We would encourage that.
  • December has been very challenging.
  • welfare.ie outlines the relief schemes/humanitarian assistance offered by Department of Social Protection.
  • 50% of claims made nationally are from County Cork.
  • 3 weeks ago the Southern Star said that Cork County Council was potentially delaying the payment of the €5,000 to some applicants because of a delay in processing forms. Guarantees that every single form was returned within 24 hours. A similar allegation was made by a Cork County Council member in the West Cork Municipal District (Cllr Hayes) last week. It was again reported by the paper. That is not accurate at all.
  • Farmers who have suffered fodder losses are also being helped by the Department of Social Protection.
  • Thanks Members of Council for their support. Is aware that the weather conditions were challenging for councillors too. The executive tries to support as best it can. The relationship between councillors and executive on the ground was positive. Thanks also to the media, in particular 96FM and Red FM. Their reporting helped alert the public significantly.

 

 

All motions on flooding are taken together.

 

5.  West Cork Municipal District:
“In light of recent severe weather events, that this Council calls on the Government to introduce emergency legislation to facilitate the cleaning, dredging and maintenance of waterways which would override obstacles that are in place which currently hinders or prevents this type of work” and
“That this Council would provide additional funding and resources to be put in place to enable an annual maintenance and preventative programme of both roads and waterways which would leave the Council best placed to deal with future severe weather events”.

Cllr C O’Sullivan (FF): Thanks the CEO for his outline. Very informative. Commends Cork County Council and staff for their reaction. They were very visible and present. Criticism was not fair. The reaction, response and availability of area engineers and staff on the ground even to councillors was commendable.

There are two parts to the Municipal District’s motion. The first part has already been touched on. There is a mechanism that can be used to do works in rivers and streams. Inland Fisheries reacts slowly. The Municipal District urges Cork County Council to implement that mechanism. People on the ground know that some work to that effect would go some way (not all the way) to alleviating some of the issues that arose.

Part B of the motion – the whole approach to our road networks should be taken differently. These events are happening far more regularly. The winter maintenance budget and drainage in particular need addressing. The West Cork road network is devastated. The tarmac is starting to bubble up. Some 11 or 12 roads around Dunmanway are closed. Instead of reacting to these types of events, there should be a whole new approach from Council and government. Concrete gullies need to be installed where applicable. Let each Area Egnineer decide how to drain best. If you keep the water off the roads, problems will be minimised.

Cllr PG Murphy (FF): We have to think strategically how we face these problems. They are happening with more regularity. We have to be prepared for that. The CEO’s estimate of €15 – 20m is quite frightening. FG says they will put money into it but we haven’t seen that money yet. The Area Office doesn’t know what it has to play with. The staff were excellent in West Cork. The embargo on recruitment has affected the number of ground staff available to respond to events like this. We are possibly understaffed to deal with events like this. Is not sure if the OPW is fit for purpose. They huff and puff but don’t get a lot done. Dredging of rivers needs to be allowed. Our waterways, dykes and drains need to be maintained. Our winter maintenance budget was halved over the last number of years. We need to bring this back to close to where it was. We need to do an audit, look at our waterways, dredge where necessary, open up our waterways. This won’t solve all our problems but it will help. We are spending money now on patching, but we need to be using that money more strategically.

 

6.  Councillor Ian Doyle:
“That Cork County Council will apply to the Government and the Department of the environment for emergency funding. This funding is to supply staff, resources and equipment to open up the dykes drains and waterways throughout the county, particularly after the rainfall of the last few weeks. This is now an urgent matter. It also should be noted the tremendous work done by the staff of Cork County Council with the resources available to them over this period.

Cllr Doyle (FF): Praises Cork County Council staff. They worked over and beyond the call of duty. Says thank you sincerely. Have had two motions to this Council previously on the effect of the embargo. Not having front line staff to do the very basic housekeeping tasks. We have two flood problems in our Municipal District district. The flood defences in Fermoy and Mallow thankfully worked. But we have localised flooding too. In most cases, these were caused by dykes and drains not being cleared. None has been cleaned for the last 8 – 9 years around our county road network. We need to draw up a compromised plan of work to be done on this, cost it and apply for funding. We haven’t got the money ourselves to do this. We are all talking about the Municipal District approach and how effective it is going to be but we all need to have a comprensive dyke amd drain clean. We are facing a €20m bill. If the dykes and drains were cleaned, we would not have to spend this money. We need to lift the embargo. We need the Municipal Districts to meet to draw up this costed plan.

 

7.  Councillor Margaret Murphy O’Mahony:
“This Council calls on the Government for emergency funding to repair roads damaged in the recent storms. Funding to include money for cleaning of ditches, drains, streams etc. to prevent future erosion of roads when repaired.”

Cllr Murphy O’Mahony (FF): Pays special tribute to local engineer, Charlie McCarthy. He was on the end of the phone 24-7 during the flooding period. The timeframe given for the flood relief schemes are no longer acceptable. We are waiting too long. A legal challenge has affected their delivery. This is no grounds for the holding up of the schemes. A week is a quarter of the time period since the Minister’s visit. This government has blamed EU Directives for not dredging the River Bandon. Now we learn that this is not the case. Is asking for proper dredging of the River Bandon. We will face any legal challenge that arises from this. Is asking for funding for maintenance of drains, ditches, etc. Calls on the government to provide emergency funding for roads. Would like to point out the large amounts of money being diverted from our motor tax to Irish Water. This government is underspending on road maintenance and investment. Underspent by less than €289m last year. As a direct result, many roads were not able to cope with the adverse conditions. Calls on the government to provide emergency funding.

 

8.  Councillor Frank O’Flynn:
“That Cork County Council prepare a list of necessary works to be undertaken and the cost of these works arising from the recent severe flooding throughout the county and call on the Ministers for the Environment to make the necessary finding available to enable these works be carried out and that Cork County Council put in place a strategy for the future management and prevention of flooding.

Cllr O’Flynn (FF): Thanks the CE for the staff in the Fermoy Municipal District. The outdoor staff were magnificent. The engineer is fantastic. Leave him with us! Gives a vote of thanks to all the staff but especially to those in the Fermoy electoral area. Thanks the gardai, the Civil Defence, the Fire Brigade. The embargo needs to be lifted. This should go as an emergency motion from this meeting. Numerous people are asking that the message on the emergency line would be shorter. It would make it easier for people in an emergency. The €20m figure should go to the Minister. We need a designated person in Cork County Council and a designated number to help families who have been affected by the flooding. Asks that we put a team in place to look at planning. Noel O’Keeffe was big into water harvesting. We don’t do it any more. For future flooding and future problems, we need to put a strategic team together.

 

Party leaders:

Cllr Murphy (FG): Thanks all the staff. This was an extraordinary flood. Does not believe any drainage works would have helped. The drainage works that were supposed to take place in Bandon were challenged over the years by Inland Fisheries. If we don’t get to grips with the response from Inland Fisheries, we are going nowhere. There was one challenge from a contractor and another from Inland Fisheries. We have to ask Inland Fisheries to back off. Is deeply concerned that another challenge could come to the Bandon flood relief scheme. David Keane (County Engineer) said that as far as he is concerned, the ownership of the waterways has been passed over to the farmers. Wants clarification of who owns the waterways. Agrees with Cllr Doyle that we need a countywide policy in relation to drainage in each Municipal District. We are just coming to grips with improvements in our road network and all of a sudden we have taken a massive step backwards. In some cases the roads are totally washed away.   In Kinsale, there were about 9 premises in total affected.

Cllr McGrath (FF): Thanks CE for report. Would have liked it in advance of the meeting. Some hosueholders and businesses have experienced a horrendous time. We need to be as constructive as we can and set about developing plans for the future. It has been the wettest and warmest winter on record. There is an inadequacy in ability to respond due to shortage of outdoor staff on the ground. Ongoing maintenance of drainage infrastructure has been a problem for some time. Those on the ground did their absolute best but there was a shortage of numbers. We need to recruit more outdoor staff. We have seen hypocrisy from some government Ministers who are trying to pass the buck back to local authorities. We do not have the resources we need to deal with this situation. Alan Kelly would be particularly culpable here. We are told that flooding has not been caused by a lack of funding. But there are two examples in his Municipal District alone here where funding was a direct cause of flooding. Ballinhassig, flooded in 2009 and flooded again in 2015. We have tried to get funding from the OPW for flood relief for Ballinhassig but no funding was received. Glenbrook in Passage West saw flooding in the last few weeks and again in 2009. A flood relief scheme has been submitted and adequate funding has not been made available. This kind of extreme weather is going to be recurring and we need to make plans. Acknowledges the efforts made by the community.

Cllr Hurley (Ind): Supports all that has been said. Seconds Cllr Doyle’s motion. We need to get back to basics getting the work that needs to be done on the ground done. We need proper maintenance of rivers. The government needs to introduce emergency legislation to facilitate the cleaning, dredging and maintenance of rivers and waterways. Inland Fisheries have indeed been an obstacle in the past. We need an annual maintenance and preventative programme for both rivers and roads. They are neglected and do not have the holding capacity any more. We cannot be waiting years and years for flood relief to be carried out. We need a longer term solution. West Cork is a beautiful place but the roads are built on bog and rock. It takes very little to affect the surface. This is what has happened. Local authorities are starved of resources to deal with events like these. The 2016 roads allocation was €9m. It is a drop in the ocean.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): A lack of investment in some of the flood relief programmes has been a cause of flooding. Mentioned Bandon and Glenbrook. Douglas-Togher was affected but not as badly as other areas. Flood relief there was effective in protecting may be one or two properties but had a spin-off effect on other properties. What is the procedure for distribution of sandbags? Can residents arrive to collect them? Understands that if some properties had received sandbags, they might not get assistance from the Red Cross. Would like clarification on this. Knows Cork County Council worked extremely hard. But understands that the workers got time off in lieu. Thinks they should get time and a half or double time as compensation for the effort made. CE said on News at One that we have adequate resources. Cork County Council had 1,285 outdoor staff in 2008 and 478 in 2014. Would be very surprised if this gave us adequate resources! Pays tribute to the community, particularly in looking after the elderly and infirm.

Cllr Rasmussen (Lab): It is time to reflect and see what we can learn. Many people had difficulty in getting through on the emergency line.   Had a motion in about blocked drains at Municipal District level to see could we draw up a list of drain cleaning that should be done in the Municipal District. The response wasn’t good. The attitude seemed to be “why should we be doing this?”. Appreciates that drain cleaning is not enough to solve the problem but it does help. Is concerned that because there are so many roads, the man-hours necessary to fix them will be a problem. Asks about 3 – 4 roads closed in his own area of Cobh.

 

Other Members comment:

Cllr O’Keeffe (FF): Staff were exhausted but morale was high. The embargo will have to be lifted. The flood relief works worked really well in Mallow and Fermoy. We need a reserve crew in place to erect the flood barriers. The area staff staff were not available to erect the flood barriers in Fermoy when they were needed. €500m for flood defence works announced by government. But what happens if this is not built. It took two floods in Bandon to get the proper pumps in place. Sandbags were scarce.

Cllr Sheppard (FG): Disappointed that we got the CE’s report only this morning. We needed it with the agenda or on Friday. Acknowledges the work of the Council staff over the Christmas. Although we did what we could do, it wasn’t really enough. Rang the emergency number 28 times before it was answered. Was trying to get sandbags for an estate in Glanmire in which the houses had no insurance which was about to flood. The shores were very blocked in Cobh but we largely got away with it. Some roads are still closed off at the back of the Island. We are told they are not a high priority because other areas are worse. Glanmire is listed as a medium level of risk. It really should be classified as high. Council staff were pumping the Glashaboy river and commends them for that, but houses in this area have no flood insurance. The buck is being passed and would like to see action on this. We need to be more proactive.

Cllr M Collins (Ind): Commends all those from Council, voluntary staff, etc. who worked so hard. The cleaning of the rivers has been stopped by rules and regulations. Asked for an emergency meeting on 28th December but rules and regulations would not allow this either. In the UK, David Cameron was allowed to call an emergency meeting. It is rules and procedures that have stopped us from doing necessary maintenance. The staff embargo has prevented us from doing necessary maintenance. Recently met a retired council worker who commented on the regularity of cleaning of dykes, etc. in the old days. There are roads closed everywhere. It has been a disaster in West Cork in relation to these three storms. We have to be ready to act when these events hit us.

Cllr N O’Donovan (FG): The Council staff from top to bottom made a serious effort.   We have to learn from these events. This government is taking flooding seriously. Agrees with Cllr Collins that West Cork is a disaster. Roads that were resurfaced during the year have been washed away again. We are wasting money. Would like to see us focusing on our core function: road structure. Would like a proper plan prepared on drainage and dykes. Possibly write to the Department about looking for more discretion on spending in this area.

Cllr J Collins (FG): Commends the efforts of staff in the Carrigaline area. They were out morning, noon and night. It started raining on 8th November and we had only 2 dry days between that and Christmas. So the ground was saturated. We have no early warning with regard to saturation. The OPW should advise well in advance of flooding. We did build on floodplains in the last 30 years. Spoke of the bog in Bandon. When he was growing up, the donkeys were on the bog in Bandon and they were taken off for the winter. Now there is a shopping centre on the bog. The NRA made totally inadequate efforts on the N25 around Killeagh. Imagine if a closure of that length of time had happened along the M50 in Dublin!

Cllr Coleman (Ind): 29,000 hours is a lot of hours for the Council staff to be out working over Christmas. Thanks the public also for the work they did. Who is running the show in any town? Is it the chief supervisor or the engineer? Has the Department indicated that it will come forward with funding? Was disturbed when Inland Fisheries Ireland indicated that its perspective on the Local Authorities Works Act of 1949 differs from ours. If flood defences are proposed, then surely it should be obvious that flood control is necessary. Thinks we should get a legal view on the European legislation and the 1949 legislation, find out for ourselves how far we can go and what we should do. There is a reason this legislation was made. Was surprised to see that consultants are being employed to do corrective action in the Bandon area. Would like more detailed commentary on that.

Cllr S McCarthy (FG): Am a resident of Midleton. Cork County Council response was good but not sure how good it would have been without the response of the community. Companies, business community, Red Cross, fire brigade were all out to help. The one concern though throughout all of this was communication. We need to look at this going forward. There was a problem for public representatives. The people on the ground were looking to us and we didn’t have the answers. The emergency number is a number available to everybody. The emergency line is subcontracted to a call centre in Dublin. A call centre in Dublin is just not good enough. I asked many times for feedback when I rang that number. But I never got that feedback. We need a task force in place. Asks that elected members would be kept in the loop. Will have a motion in 2 weeks time. Need a direct line for elected members in crises like this. Also a text alert system.

Cllr Mullane (SF): We are lucky in Mallow because we have flood defences. Many saw pictures of the Mallow flood plain. It had 8 – 9 feet of water. There are two families still in that. Wants to ask whether they will have access to the humanitarian assistance scheme? There is no plan or protocol for when there is a flood. Could we write to the Department on this? The embargo needs to be lifted because of the cut in outdoor staff. The Sinn Féin MEP has done work on the dredging of rivers of streams. The EU Directives do not ban dredging of rivers and streams. Nothing in the Directives stop dredging when that dredging is in the overriding public interest.

Cllr O’Donovan (FG): Agrees with Cllr Doyle about clearing of dykes and ditches. Wanted to ask about the interim works for Bandon. What is the time period within which the consultant needs to come back to Council?

Cllr B Moynihan (FF): Getting water off the roads is so important. We have a sparse population where I come from but a high density of roads. Municipal Districts work well but we have no idea how we are going to deal with this problem into the future. Our Municipal Districts have no money, no matter what the Minister is saying. Wants to know when this money the Minister is talking about is going to be available. We have top class people. They know how to solve the problems but they have no money for it.

(6 FF present)

Cllr R McCarthy (SF): Thanks all in the community and voluntary sector. These were staff that were on their holidays. Cllr J O’Donovan was filling sandbags in the Council yard. He was also out on Christmas Day. Who is coordinating the emergency plan? Is asking that footpaths would be cleaned in Bandon and the playground also. Reminds councillors that the Sinn Féin team had suggested in its alternative budget that €200k would be put aside to clear waterways and drains, etc. This was rejected.

Cllr Hayes (SF): Thanks to all the staff, emergency services, etc. There was a huge community effort also. Spoke of Directives and their implications. Rivers can be restocked after dredging but dredging needs to happen. Alan Kelly is on the TV and radio regularly with a very big wallet. There are 12,000 km roads in Cork County and we have one of the lowest allocations in return from road tax. We had a good meeting with Minister Harris in Bandon. Knows the local engineers were putting together a plan/wish list to send to the OPW for pumps, etc. Is wondering if this list has gone yet? Installation of non-return valves should be on the list. Refers to the piece in the Southern Star that the CE mentioned. His reference to delays in processing were taken directly from a letter circulated to all councillors by the Red Cross. He quoted the letter directly.

Cllr Carroll (FF): Thanks the CE for the report. Is there any kind of a bonus scheme for the council workers, etc? Also concerned that they won’t hear our thanks from this morning. Thanks the farmers that came up from West Cork. We are tired of Department officials and Inland Fisheries hiding behind Directives. These Directives do not apply if there is a human issue at stake. They cannot hold up a scheme. The road network in West Cork cannot be compared to roads in any other county. We collect the road tax for the government as their agent. We need a return on this.

Cllr N Collins (Ind): Thanks to all who assisted. Time is running out for funding to help the people of Midleton get back to their homes. There is both fluvial and tidal flooding in Midleton. Midleton Town Council approved major capital for the provision of flood defences in Midleton town. This being so, it would be best to have a single flooding contract to deal with both flooding types. Moves this as a proposal. Thanks all the locations that have put up affected families. Thanks the farming community for their tankers.

Cllr Lombard (FG): Congratulates all. Ballinhassig was flooded badly. It flooded badly three times since 2009. We need to look at the rivers themselves. We have been told that legally landowners are obliged to clean their rivers. We need clarity on this.

Cllr Forde (FG): Spoke about Council staff. Would like us to be able to deploy extra staff. Should be more availability of sandbags. Curraheen was in danger of having a major incident. They only barely escaped. Asks about Lee CFRAMS study. Thinks the Municipal Districts have a greater role to play in relation to texting in emergencies. Thinks a meeting of the Municipal District should have been convened immediately to discuss issues like, to clarify where were sandbags available, etc. The volume of water in Douglas was phenomenal. Ravensdale was very serious. The water should have been dredged there much earlier. The government has responded. The local authority has the expertise but we do need to bear in mind that in relation to planning, zoning and conditions, we need to be far more careful in relation to our Local Area Plans. What debate have we had in relation to mitigating measures we are taking in relation to climate change? When Douglas was flooded, she asked for a review of the insurance industry. People’s policies become renewed at different times and there is no data available. This is a real problem. Hopes it can be addressed now.

Cllr Barry (FG): Spoke of the emergency number. Felt totally out of the loop because he could not contact that number. All he wanted was sandbags. Collins Barracks was going to bring them down but needed authorisation from the Cork County Council. We couldn’t get that. A local contractor tore out a trash screen and kept the floods down. There are still houses in Carrigtwohill pumping water. We have a serious issue with the Masterplans and the Local Area Plans. The Masterplan areas were under serious flooding for the last number of days. We have to look at this again.

(5 FF, 9 FG present now)

Cllr A Moynihan (FF): Praised staff and communities. The staff was hugely overstretched. It is clear that the embargo needs to be lifted. There needs to be a drainage campaign. Yet on its own it is not adequate. There needs to be a comprehensive flood defence plan brought forward by the OPW. They are working on some of them but it is too slow. They need to look upstream as well as downstream. Look at sewers in villages. Some are backing up. It is good that the CE has compiled the report. Road tax not coming back is driving people mad. The funding figure that the CE identified as necessary needs to be made available.

Cllr K McCarthy (Ind): Staff and communities were wonderful but resources were a real issue. We are going to have a lot more emergencies. €430m over the next 5 years is pocket money for what we will see over the coming years. We need to get serious about this. The government needs to respond. Visited people last Saturday who had never been visited by the Council. People in small towns and villages are still waiting. The government must respond better.

Cllr Buckley (SF): Cork County Council has employed a consultant to advise on why Midleton is flooding. Before Midleton Town Council was disbanded, we had put €1.2 m aside for flood protection in the bottom end of the town. On the other side of the town, a study had been carried out and had predicted flooding. We know what is wrong. We have a 30 page report to tell us. We just need to use the €1.2m to help the traders and business people and to implement the recommendations of that report.

Cllr Hegarty (FG): Seconds Cllr Collin’s motion in relation to flood defences for Midleton. There are roads that are cut off at present and the Council should get bog mats on top of those roads to enable them to be used. Thanks the CE and Mayor for coming to Midleton. We have to get back to local knowledge. With regard to the N25, there are caves there which if they were cleaned and maintained would address the situation. TII were trying to raise the road by a meter. A seriously affected family were never underwater before and TII was trying to bulldoze over them while shoving the problem further over the road. There were some isolated incidents with narrow drains and culverts. Some landowners would not let us in to clean them out.

Cllr D’Alton: Agree 100% with all previous speakers in relation to drains needing to be cleared, ditches and rivers needing to be cleaned but this is something we shouldn’t even have to ask for. It should be part of general maintenance. But has major concerns about the calls for dredging of rivers. Rivers are not buckets. Buckets are static storage devices whereas rivers are dynamic. Water flows through them. How much depends on rainfall. How fast depends on gravity. Doesn’t matter how wide or deep the river is made between these restrictions, the volume of water the river can process is limited by the most restricted points the water has to flow past. But our landscape has been managed for fifty years and more according to the very opposite logic. Pinch-points on our rivers are, ironically, all man-made: bridges, weirs and towns. Dredging the silt build-up around these pinch points may help. And clearing river channels of dumping and poorly maintained river banks will help too. But dredging that involves digging or sucking out fine silt from the river bed is totally different. People who are in favour of dredging think that a bigger river will allow water to flow faster and more efficiently. Reality is that even if the capacity of the river is increased by 50%, that river can’t provide the same volume of storage as a floodplain. So dredging might help in the smaller, more regular flood events but it will not help in the less frequent major flood events. Worse, because dredging can speed up the flow of water in a river, it can increase the risk of flooding downstream. And dredging has to be repeated over and over or there will be no benefit to be gained from it at all. We need to address the decades of mismanagement of river systems. Over the past 50 years, we have done all we can to increase the volume and flow of water entering the rivers, to increase the volume of silt being carried to the rivers, to constrict the flow of water in the river channels and to remove floodplains. Rather than planting conifers on uplands which, when cut, leave compacted hard soil, we need to plant native tree species which soak 67% more water. Where we build, we create hard surfaces – roofs, driveways, roads, patios. Each industrial development should have an infiltration swale or a rain garden into which surface water is diverted. This will allow controlled release of rainwater into rivers. We need to stop building on floodplains. In relation to the consultant being employed to report on flooding in Midleton, when I was doing my post-graduate, my supervisor had a expertise in hydrology. He was commissioned to examine a site in Midleton and I, being his student went along with him. The site was a floodplain not far upstream of Midleton town centre. He recommended that the site would not be built on. It was a floodplain that was needed by the river. But within 5 years it was built on. The Owenacurra, having been deprived of its spill over area simply took the next easiest place to spill out, which was Midleton town centre.

Cllr Linehan-Foley (Ind): The roads in East Cork are shocking. Some are impassable. When the N25 was closed, these secondary roads were the only roads available. Would have liked more time to read the CE’s report.   Acknowledges the massive community effort. People were out to help other people. Do we have a timescale on fixing these roads? Can you please bring this down to the Municipal District level so we can help with the prioritising of the roads which need to be fixed? Let them please contact local councillors to help them do this. This local knowledge is necessary.

Cllr J Murphy (Ind): Members were getting text updates from our engineer. The embargo is an awful headache for him.   It is an issue that comes up for us but when you have a crisis it shows that lifting of the embargo would go a long way. The area engineer has a huge concern about parents putting children up on the flood barriers in Fermoy to have a look. Also youngsters are walking on barriers. To see the barriers being erected is quite a spectacle but one false move and whoever is on top of them is gone.

Cllr Conway (Ind): Reiterates what Cllr Doyle said. It took him one full day to find a gully which would solve a problem. While there was plenty of local support to do this, we still have two roads closed in Blarney. One has 26 residents living on it. We put hardcore on it to help those people using that road. How does the digger driver that broke ditches to drain the water stand? How do I stand as the person who spread the hardcore? What happens if an accident occurs now that the road is closed? Will those in the accident be covered by insurance?

Cllr Hegarty (FG): Walked the banks of the Owenacurra recently. Was shocked at the volume of debris and trees in the water and on the banks. Some of our rivers are operating at 50% of their capacity.

Cllr Creed (FG): Fully concurs with this. A relatively small job in Ballingeary was done on cleaning the river and this has made a huge difference.

(4 FF, 14 FG, 6 SF, 9 Ind present)

Mayor: Compliments everyone on their efforts during the crisis – staff, councillors, emergency teams. There is a severe shortfall of funding. We need €15 – 20m from the Department of Transport to do works on roads. Our staff are doing everything possible to make sure the roads can be travelled on. Acknowledges the money that has come from the Department of the Environment to date, although that will not be enough either. We have used €5m already in this Council alone.

CE:

  • Knows the time left in the meeting is short but would like to respond to all Members comments as comprehensively as possible. Would have liked to have circulated the report earlier but it was not finished until 10.30pm last night. If it could have been done faster, it would have been. Members’ motions will be sent on to national level. They will pick up on the key issues such as funding, resources, infrastructural works, etc.
  • We will not have a detailed schedule of works for another week or two.
  • There still are 42 roads closed in 3 of 8 Municipal Districts. The others are still undergoing assessment.
  • If your land is next to a watercourse, it is assumed that your land runs to the middle of the watercourse. Will confirm this. The CE read aloud some statutory responsibilities of owners with land beside a river.
  • Cork County Council is not responsible for maintaining the waterways of Cork County. In emergency situations, we will do what we can. But we are not responsible for maintaining waterways free of obstructions, etc.
  • Drainage – resources – we can’t pull a rabbit out of a hat. We will have a certain level of funding available to us. We have had to reduce our workforce to remain financially stable. That’s not going to change. There is a real challenge in terms of getting around to drainage works. We need to recruit staff for drainage works, but we can’t. We can take existing staff off potholes, etc. and put them on drainage. This should be considered at Municipal District level. There is no magic wand to this. Having this matter on the agendas of our Municipal Districts over the next few months is very important. We will be examining to see what the right mix here is. There are implications for other works if we focus entirely on drainage.
  • Dredging is effective when done in conjunction with an overall plan for a watercourse. For dredging in small areas, it is ineffective, as Cllr D’Alton said. The OPW may also take this view. Will consider further the Inland Fisheries response. If planned flood relief schemes don’t go ahead, we will also have to consider what this Council’s response should be.
  • The list of works needing to be done in watercourses must be itemised and funded. I have no revenue or capital funding for this. This is not an easy problem to solve. Has given no commitment that we are in a position to undertake interim works on the Bandon scheme. That commitment was given by the OPW. I had identified three things that might help when Minister Harris was down. But we as a Council do not have the resources to do them. Although licence was taken locally by some and it was assumed that because I recommended them, the County Council was going to deliver them.
  • Yes, we would like more resources on the ground.
  • The procedure for getting sandbags varies. Some people collect them, but we also distribute them. We gave out 31,000 sandbags during the December floods. We will have our own internal review and will look at these procedures then also. Doesn’t think there is any restriction on getting Red Cross assistance if one has already got sandbags.
  • Is limited by Haddington Road in what overtime he can pay.
  • The emergency line helped but yes, improvements can be made. 85% of the calls were taken and responded to. Average waiting time was 30 seconds. Rang it to test it and was kept waiting 45 seconds. We tried to put more resources on this. We already have suggestions on how to improve this. The emergency line took 1,500 – 1,600 calls. Sometimes people found it difficult to get through, but that wasn’t the norm. Some calls are dropped after 20 seconds if not answered.
  • The flood barriers in Fermoy are owned by the OPW. There is a contractor in place to maintain them. Three of our staff were taken away from our normal duties to help erect them. We will have to review this.
  • In Mallow, we erect all the flood barriers ourselves. Perhaps the OPW should use a contractor to erect the barriers.
  • The N25 was a real challenge. Impacted primarily by groundwater challenges and infiltration of the underground cave network. We brought in the best equipment we could. Whitegate Oil Refinery helped pump water for over a mile. The more we pumped, the more the groundwater came up and up and up. There is a problem there with getting access from one particular landowner.
  • The estates Cllr Sheppard referred to in Glanmire: Meadowbank was saved by Council staff but Copper Valley was flooded, although only once. A second flooding was averted by Cork County Council action.
  • The executive held meetings over Christmas, the staff were on overtime dealing with the situation. The last thing anybody wanted was to call yet another meeting with councillors.
  • Cork County Council is responsible for leading the coordination of the agencies on the ground. The Area Engineers liaise with the gardai, etc. While they do not have the role of coordinating the community response, there is very effective system in place in Skibbereen which we need to look at. The community is working very well with the local authority.
  • Assistance for the families in Mallow can be responded to only by the Department of Social Protection.
  • To Cllr Hayes – was not aware the OPW committed to providing funding for pumps. In relation to the Southern Star article, please could Cllr Hayes provide a copy of the Red Cross letter.
  • Will personally ensure that staff is thanked. We will get a letter out from the Council, expressing the sentiments of Council.
  • Will talk to the County Engineer about Curraheen and the Lee CFRAMS study.
  • There is a very formal procedure to get the defence forces out. This procedure cannot be worked around. We used that. It is not possible to call them in through the normal emergency services. It has come through our offices with that formal protocol.
  • The consultant’s report for Midleton is expected in a few days. It is about upstream remedial measures.
  • Addressed all councillors individually. Agreed that the effects of spot dredging is very limited. It is good only as part of an entire scheme. But engineers will deal with this.
  • We are undertaking our own review. The issues all Members have raised will be part of that review.

 

 

[g]           VOTES OF CONGRATULATIONS
9.  VOTES OF CONGRATULATIONS (if any)

Some congratulations were issued.

 

10.  ANY OTHER BUSINESS

Cllr Linehan-Foley (Ind) asked about a date for the reception for the Special Olympics.

Sean O’Callaghan: We did contact them on several occasions and they could not arrange a date in January. The delay is not our fault.

 

* The remainder of the meeting was deferred.

 

[f]            NOTICES OF MOTION
11.  Councillor Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire:
“Go néilíonn an Chomhairle seo ar Bonneagar Iompair Éireann teacht os chomhair an Chomhairle, le míniú a thabhairt ar an Staidéar Bainistiú Éileamh don N40 atá idir lámha acu, agus ar na tuairiscí a deánadh le deánaí tar éis dóibh bheith cruinniú de choiste an Chomhairle Chathrach, go bhfuil BIE ag moladh tollaí a chur ar an bóthar, agus le nithe ábharach a phlé leo.

That this Council requests that Transport Infrastructure Ireland come before the Council, to outline the Demand Management Study currently being undertaken by them on the N40, and to respond to reports recently following their meeting a committee of Cork City Council, that TII is considering tolling the road, and to discuss related matters.”
[Deferred from Council Meeting on the 14/12/15]

 

12.  Councillor Kevin Murphy:
“That Cork County Council seeks an immediate meeting with the Minister Kelly, Minister for the Environment and Local Government and Minister Coffey, Minister for State, to address the serious anomaly that has arisen in regard to the limits on County Council’s House Purchase and City House Purchase Scheme.”
[Deferred from Council Meeting on the 14/12/15]

 

13.  Councillor Noel Collins:
“That this Council call on the Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform to consider an early change in the Inheritance Tax Laws.”
[Deferred from Council Meeting on the 14/12/15]

 

14.  Councillor Aindrias Moynihan:
“Lorgionn Comhairle Contea ar an Aire Coimirce Sóisioltí deireadh a chuir leis an slí go bhfuilid ag idirghealú de reir aos daoine, nuair ata an leibheal pinsean ranníocach á dheanamh amach acu.

That Cork County Council calls on the Minister for Social Protection to end the age discriminatory way the contributory pension levels are being calculated.”
[Deferred from Council Meeting on the 14/12/15]

 

15.  Councillor Michael Collins:
” I call on the Minister for Finance to provide the funding for a number of urgent issues to safe guard our Primary Schools.
1. For an immediate and proper reduction in class sizes in 2015.
2. To give proper state funding for the running costs of our primary schools.
3. To allow funding in future budgets for teaching Principals to have one day a week off with substitute cover free from teaching. This would greatly improve the management of schools and benefit children.
[5/10/15]

Cork County Council Community Grant Schemes 2016

Cork County Council is now accepting applications for its three community grant schemes for 2016.

The three schemes are the Amenity Grant scheme, the Capital Grant scheme and the Community Fund scheme.

These schemes are ideally suited to community and sporting groups, tidy towns groups, residents associations and any other group involved in the community.

Queries on the schemes can be addressed to myself or the following County Council staff members:
Amenity Fund: niamh.kearney@corkcoco.ie, tel 4285157
Capital Fund: eileen.oleary@corkcoco.ie, tel 4285315
Community Contract: sarah.osullivan@corkcoco.ie, 4285116

The application forms and guidance are downloadable here:
Municipal District Community Application Forms 2016
Municipal District Community Fund Schemes 2016

The closing date for all three grant schemes is 4th February.  Late applications will not be accepted.

Notes from the special meeting of the Ballincollig-Carrigaline Municipal District on the Shannonpark Masterplan, 5th January 2016

Executive present: Kevin O’Regan (MDO), Andrew Hind (Senior Planner), Ross Palmer (Senior Executive Planner), Martin Ryan (Executive Planner)

Councillors present: Derry Canty (FG), John Collins (FG), Marcia D’Alton (Ind), Mary Rose Desmond (FF), Deirdre Forde (FG), Joe Harris (Ind), Seamus McGrath (FF), Michael Frick Murphy (SF), Daithi O’Donnabhain (FF, Chairperson), Donnacha O’Laoghaire (SF)

 

AH: The purpose of this meeting is give Members a chance to voice their concerns about the Shannonpark Masterplan. The key issue to be discussed today is that of connectivity.

(He ran over the concerns listed by the residents in relation to the proposed connectivity.)

This is very much a ready-to-go site. We anticipate the amendment being closely followed by a planning application. We see the site as being an important part of providing an immediate relief to the shortage of housing.

In recognition of the submissions made to the Masterplan consultation, we think the best resolution to the issue of connectivity is to solve it at the planning application stage. Those who are concerned will have the right to appeal to An Bord Pleanala. Citizens who are concerned, if they are dissatisfied with Cork County Council’s decision at that stage, they have the right of appeal to an independent body.

Cllr McGrath: Thanks for facilitating today’s meeting that was requested by a number of us. Today’s meeting is absolutely essential. We could not have a proper debate on this report at the last meeting. The Masterplan issue should be debated at Municipal District level anyway. It is an enormous Masterplan and we need to get it right. Can’t support it in its current form. Thinks further changes are needed. Residents made submissions. Is very disappointed with the response from Management. The changes proposed are miniscule. Connectivity is one of the main issues. The response from Management is only shifting the deckchairs around. In many respects, the proposed paragraph strengthens the connectivity. Sets out clearly the intention of having connectivity between the two estates and refers to the planning process down the road. The residents have outlined very legitimate concerns. Response from the CE does not reflect the genuine concerns flagged by the residents. We need to review the position on this issue. Thinks we should readdress this. It is fine to put connectivity into a new development but here we are retrofitting connectivity into established residential areas and force public access points into those areas. Connectivity needs to be dropped out of the Masterplan. Another main concern are the infrastructural requirements, in particular the N28. In theory, this Masterplan could be developed in full before the N28. In one part, it refers to an upgrading of the Shannonpark roundabout or provision of the new N28. Signalisation of the Shannonpark is not enough to provide for 1000 houses. Would like to see the Carrigaline Relief Road included also. But crucially, we have to pin down provision of the new N28 with the development.

Cllr Desmond: Supports everything Cllr McGrath has said. The connectivity issue is very real for residents in Heronswood. The Masterplan cannot be supported with the connectivity and infrastructural issues that are there at present. It is not good business or practice to override concerns that the residents have raised. We are kicking to touch with regard to the changes proposed.

Cllr D’Alton: Also agree 100% with everything Cllrs McGrath and Desmond have said. Also have extreme concerns with regard to the connectivity with Heronswood. Am concerned about the linking of the development with the upgrade of the N28 but am even more concerned about the linking of the development with Carrigaline.   So many studies, so many plans have commented on traffic issues in Carrigaline and the need to improve infrastructure around the town yet this Masterplan does not as much as mention it. More importantly though, the Council proposes to provide badly need housing through Masterplans. Some have denigrated the Masterplan approach. I think it can work and this site is the first real chance for the Council to develop a Masterplan on the ground. But in its being the first, it should be a flagship. A flagship in terms of site design and house design. Building houses is one thing. Building homes is quite another. And the County Council should be about building homes. So we need to build a community, integrate it with the existing community in Heronswood. We will not do this by ignoring concerns of existing residents with regard to accessibility between the two estates. We need to integrate the new Shannonpark community with the existing community in Carrigaline. We will not do this if we ignore the issue of traffic between Shannonpark and Carrigaline. We need to provide houses that address the issues that are being discussed at national level every day: climate change, traffic, energy efficiency, water conservation. These are not addressed in the Masterplan at all. This is our first Masterplan and we need to be able to point other local authorities to it and be proud of what we have developed. Until we do that, I cannot support this Masterplan.

Cllr Collins: I can understand the need for connectivity but I am not sure that the red arrows indicated on the Masterplan are the right place to put them.   People will need connectivity to schools. In terms of getting cars off the road, this is the best way to do it. The greenway is outlined in the Masterplan. It is about 30 – 60 m wide. I suggest that half is put aside for a greenway and the other half is used as pedestrian access around the back and onto the spine road which is to run through the centre of the development. There may be issues with regard to land ownership which will have to be addressed. The way to set out dealing with issues like obesity is to encourage walking and cycling. As an alternative to the crossing points highlighted by the arrows, use the greenway. Agrees with the word “practical” in the proposed wording change. Some of the proposed crossing points are already blocked by concrete driveways, etc. So ownership is a real issue. But thinks the greenway should be that point of access between the two estates.

Cllr Canty: As the longest serving councillor, I know what this was like in Ballincollig, Grange, Douglas and Frankfield when they were developing. The residents will make their own access points. There are still people that would blacken me in relation to getting walkways closed in Ballincollig. There are people who wanted them to be kept open to allow access for walking to Mass, to school, to the shops. If there is only a ditch between the two estates in Carrigaline, they will make access themselves. If there is to be no access, the two estates will have to be fenced and walled off from one to the other. If you don’t do that, the kids will make the access points themselves.

Cllr O’Laoghaire: Will not be supporting this most recent proposed amendment in relation to connectivity but wants to recognise what is positive about the Masterplan. Much work has been done on this. By and large, it is positive. The idea of Masterplans was attacked by other councillors from other municipal districts. I support it. I think it can deliver cohesive, well-serviced communities. This Masterplan has some commitments to community facilities, to phasing, to public transport and to education. But two primary concerns relate to housing and to phasing. In September, I said that Phase 2 should not be delivered without the N28. As it stands, the Masterplan offers a choice. I said Phase 3 should not be delivered until the Western Relief Road is in place. I still hold those views. My concern around provision of social housing still stands and was discussed at some level in the Chamber. The response from Management is always centred around Part V. Cannot see why it is not possible to come to an arrangement with a developer and identify where additional social houses could be assigned. There is one social housing development being built on the southern side of the town. This will provide about 48 houses. But there are hundreds of people on the waiting list for Carrigaline. This is the biggest development which will be built in Carrigaline for many years. Believes we can find a place within it for social housing outside of the Part V agreement. Knows there is an issue with access points. Hard to see where they will fit. But there is a valid point raised by Cllr Collins, particularly as there will be a school in the Shannonpark area. There does need to be access between the two estates to allow access to the school. But it needs to be done in such a way as to impinge only in a minute way on residents of Heronswood.

Cllr Forde: Carrigaline is very lucky to have this Masterplan. We cannot look people in the eye when they are crying out for housing, we cannot but want to have this Masterplan delivered as soon as possible. Went to look on the ground. If I buy my house in a cul-de-sac, I want to stay in a cul-de-sac for a reason. To take that loss of amenity away is to deny these people their right. Supports the Masterplan as a whole and recognises that there is an issue here to be dealt with. Cllr Collins is the only one who came up with a solution. Thinks we should see this proposal as feasible. Residents mentioned the railway line as a means of access. Takes on board what Cllr D’Alton has said about the way we style things. Thinks a lot of these issues could be addressed at the planning stage. We used to have a meeting with the planners a few times each year where such issues could be thrashed out. If we reinstated this discussion between councillors and planners we could address these issues and it would be valuable. Cllr O’Laoghaire mentioned extra social housing. Recognises that we need them but we don’t want to ghettoise the estate either. Thinks this will be addressed another day. This Masterplan is absolutely vital. Between now and whenever we have to vote it through, we have to sort these issues out. Wants to support it but doesn’t want access between Heronswood at the three identified points. Cllr Canty is right that informal access will be made regardless.

Cllr Harris: Appears that a lot of work has gone into this plan. The residents of an existing estate are trying to preserve their way of life and as Cllr D’Alton said, it is an existing mature area now. Is confident that with the expertise we have in the Council, we can find a way around without these access points discommoding people. There are a lot of strong feelings about it down there at the moment and it appears they have a legitimate case. It is such a huge plan, is confused by why these access points are so vital. An awful lot of time and effort has gone into this, you have done a great job and this is a solvable problem.

Andrew Hind:  Am pleased to hear Members think this can be solved.  This is the second round of consultation to this plan. At the first stage, only 6 submissions were received, none of which were from members of the public. The purpose of that preliminary consultation was to raise issues like this when the Council had the legal freedom to change the plan. It is regrettable that this didn’t happen at that stage. We now are in the position where we may not have the legal power to change the plan. It is a difficulty that these issues were not raised earlier in the process.

From the executive side, we think there is a very strong need to support this housing provision. It is badly needed. We have been working for a large number of years to make this site a proposition. Irish Water has invested in the new wastewater treatment plant and this is one of the big infrastructural deficits which would formerly have stood in the way of the Shannonnpark development.

There is a need for connectivity between the two developments. The Shannonpark development will have social infrastructure that will also benefit Heronswood. It is hard to conceive that future residents of Heronswood will not send their children to school in Shannonpark. There will be good open space in the Shannonpark development which residents of Heronswood will want to use in the future. The public transport interchange – residents of Heronswood will want access to that. Agrees with Cllr Canty. If we confine ourselves only to access at the greenway, informal access will be created which will be more difficult to deal with in the longer run.

There are alternatives to the red arrows and that is why we are proposing to remove the red arrows from the Masterplan. The type of alternative proposed by Cllr Collins is the type of proposal the new text is intended to facilitate. Because of the legal restrictions imposed on us, we cannot make specific reference to such alternatives.

The issue of tying the development to the delivery of the N28 and nothing else is that we carried out an independent traffic assessment of the impact of the development. This was published publicly. The upgrade of the Shannonpark roundabout will have capacity to accommodate the development. It is a fact from an independent source. Delivery of social housing is a matter for the housing section of the County Council. At a planning level we are limited to operating within the parameters of Part V.

Cllr McGrath: Referring to two public consultations is very disingenuous. The first did not have detail like the second.

Ross Palmer: Yes it did. The two documents are almost exactly the same. There were very few changes made because there were so few submissions.

Cllr McGrath: I said at that Municipal District meeting that connectivity with Heronswood would be an issue. What was the point of the consultation if people sent submissions in good faith and you are now saying that legally we cannot change the plan?

Andrew Hind: You could also turn that question around. What was the point in the preliminary consultation when these issues which were so deeply held by residents were not raised then? Not a single submission was received from the public and not a single comment was made in this Chamber along these lines. At that time, we made it clear that the law had changed, the Council had been involved in a legal case in Charleville over making changes to plans at a late stage and we made it clear that we could not allow material changes at a late stage in the consultation process. What we have done is that we have proposed a change. We have taken out the word “it is critical” and replaced it with “where practical”. This is a downgrading of the issue of connectivity, not an upgrading. And we have taken the red arrows off the plan.

Cllr O’Donnabhain: Asks that a briefing note would be sent in relation to the statutory process, the various steps the Council is obliged to adhere to and the Charleville case.

Andrew Hind: We have quoted from the act in the report. Page 7. In our view, if we move from a position of some connectivity to no connectivity, this is a step too far for the meaning of this paragraph. We are proposing to move from a policy environment which says “connectivity is critical” to “connectivity is best considered at the planning application stage”.

Cllr D’Alton: I do not disagree about the need for connectivity between the two estates but it cannot be at the expense of existing residents. Cllr Collins’s suggestion about the greenway may be the answer. It is just not fair to residents of Heronswood to provide this connectivity through their cul-de-sacs. When they were buying their houses, they specifically sought out houses in a cul-de-sac because they wanted a particular lifestyle, they wanted their children to grow up in a place that was relatively safe to play in. They paid a premium for that privilege. It is not fair that the County Council would now come along and propose to destroy the way of life existing residents have actively sought and enjoyed. The proposed wording will not do because it does not provide existing residents with the reassurance they need.

Andrew Hind: If we added the “views of local residents” to “where practical”, would that be making process?

Cllr Forde: Thinks this may be a way forward. Doesn’t buy into some of the things the residents outlined but if I buy a house in a cul-de-sac, I expect it to stay a cul-de-sac until I no longer want it to be a cul-de-sac. We do need to walk and get healthier and we’ll be the very ones screeching at management when flooding is on the road, etc. But we never talk about what we can do. Cllr D’Alton is right about the bigger picture. I hopes a lot of these issues will be teased out and responded to at the planning level.

Cllr Collins: Supports the idea that these people who bought their houses in cul-de-sacs deserve their privacy, etc. It was mentioned that there were legal issues with regard to some of the access points indicated. I’m not going to support the proposed red arrows and believe my suggestion would keep the integrity of the both estates but would provide connectivity. We are already providing a greenway through it. It might be a way around this issue.

Cllr O’Laoghaire: Suggested that none of these issues were brought up at the preliminary consultation. They were. Doesn’t think that 20% of 1000 houses is anything like ghettoization. Provision of a school is the responsibility of the Department of Education. If we are going this far, why can we not plan social housing also? There was reference to a railway station in the preliminary consultation document – is that still there?

Martin Ryan: Yes there was but that has been removed.

Cllr O’Laoghaire: In terms of a process, what would it require of the planning officials that will be dealing with an application if they have to take account of a document like that?

Andrew Hind: Reluctant to give a definitive statement because there is no planning application in front of us. If we include a reference to taking an account of local residents, it is an invitation to the residents to submit their points of view. It will indicate that the elected members of the Council have stated in the Local Area Plan that the views of the residents on this issue are an especially important aspect when taking a decision on this issue. Not that they wouldn’t be taken into account anyway, but it is putting extra emphasis on them.

Cllr Harris: The issue is one of trust from the residents point of view if these arrows are put away for a while and reintroduced again.

Andrew Hind: The proposal is to put the arrows away and not to reintroduce them into the Local Area Plan.

Cllr Harris: Communicating and allaying people’s fears is the most important thing. If we can communicate to the residents our bona fides, that would help a lot.

Cllr Canty: We are an hour and a quarter into this and we have all had our say. Could we have five minutes out to have a chat ourselves and then come back and agree consensus? We need consensus regardless of what residents will say.

Cllr Collins clarified that because of the phasing of construction, there is only one red arrow causing an immediate problem. That is through Woodvale. Could that be taken off and the others left on to be dealt with at a later date? Also clarifying that the red arrow by the entrance will remain.

Andrew Hind: We will retain the single red arrow by the entrance. So the only access in the context of the first future planning application is the red arrow through Woodvale. Doesn’t want to take one red arrow off and leave the others on. Wants to deal with them all in the same way.

Cllr O’Laoghaire: Is it possible to make a reference to the desirability of retaining existing cul-de-sacs?

Andrew Hind: Not under the Act. We cannot go from “connectivity is critical” to “cul-de-sacs must be preserved”. If we get rid of the reference to “critical” it is not such an about-face.

Cllr Collins: In any event, the Masterplan is about the Shannonpark lands, not about Heronswood. So referring to preserving cul-de-sacs would not be possible?

Andrew Hind confirmed that that is correct.

Cllr D’Alton: There were no public responses to the preliminary consultation and then many many responses to the second consultation. One of the issues – and this whole issue of consultation needs to be discussed at full Council level – is that people are very busy with their daily lives. They find it difficult to connect with Council consultations and with other consultations. It is also very hard to relate to a text-based consultation. But during the Council’s second consultation period, Astra had a public information event. Unlike the Masterplan consultation, they provided plans and illustrations of what the Shannonpark development might look like. So for the first time, people were able to see for real what the potential issues were. Perhaps this is something we as a Council need to try to learn from: to talk in pictures as much as possible rather than in words. I bet if you check the dates of your submissions, you will find that most of them arrived towards the end of the consultation period. This was after the Astra information event. I also mentioned other concerns I had in relation to the Masterplan. These were connectivity with Carrigaline and the overall sustainability of the layout and housing design. These haven’t been addressed by anyone at all, apart from Cllr Forde who was kind enough to mention them! You mentioned there were no comments in the Chamber about these issues. In fact, I did mention the issue of connectivity between Shannonpark and Carrigaline and Ringaskiddy at the Municipal District meeting at which the preliminary consultation was discussed. You chaired that discussion, Ross and you agreed that those issues were really important.

Cllr McGrath: Would like to see further clarity in relation to the legal process. Presume the preliminary consultation is non-statutory? Under the legislation, is it the case that there is only one consultation required?

Andrew Hind: No. It is called non-statutory because Section 20 of the Act says that the planning authority will take “whatever steps it sees fit” to consult with the public, etc. So we do this non-statuory consultation to respond to that broad remit. So although it is non-statutory, it is actually statutory! I am trying to stop calling it “non-statutory” and to call it “preliminary” instead.

Cllr McGrath: When you do undertake statutory consultation, is there any provision for incorporating a significant change subsequently?

Andrew Hind: No. It cannot be done under current legislation. If the County Council wanted to make a material change, the County Council would have to abandon the proposed amendment and begin again. It would have to do the preliminary and secondary consultation gain. This would take an extra 6 months probably.

Cllr McGrath: Surely the preliminary consultation would not be required seeing as there have already been two consultations? So that would mean one further consultation of 6 weeks. If the will is there, this should be possible.

Andrew Hind: We have to be careful with that. We have never done it before so we have no precedent to refer to. Would have to think about it. If the Council Members instruct the executive to proceed in this way, then that is what we will do. There are parts of this consultation that the public does not see, like giving the authorities and the various government departments a statutory time to respond to the consultation.

Cllr Forde: We came in here today with an issue of connectivity being the primary concern. We really need to focus on the job in hand. One of the issues raised was permeability from the cul-de-sacs. The executive has proposed alternative wording to respond to my concern. There is phasing involved which buys us time. The second issue is that of social housing.   Thinks this can be addressed through our Housing SPC and then coming to full Council to change the 10% to 12 or 15%. Also Cllr D’Alton’s issues of quality of estates, issues we meet on a daily basis, climate change and all these issues are really important. To address this, can we reinstate the meeting between the planners and councillors once each semester?

Cllr D’Alton: My points please? Could we address those?

Andrew Hind: A design guide for residential estates was approved by elected members some time ago. It is a very positive document.   Presenting visual imagery in consultations is a problem because the Council is not designing the development. Nonetheless, accepts the point made. As regards connectivity between the estate and Carrigaline, the two new Municipal District Local Area Plans for Carrigaline are going to have a chapter to discuss solutions to this kind of issue. This is the best place to raise this issue.

Ross Palmer: It is correct that we did discuss this before. The Masterplan document talks about the importance of connectivity of this site to the town and Ringakiddy via the greenway. So the greenway is the key here.

Cllr D’Alton: That is absolutely true that the greenway will be essential to connectivity. But if the greenway is going to solve this problem, then why is there a big straight spine road running through the Shannonpark estate splitting residential areas in two?

Ross Palmer: Practice tells us that at least 20% of people will be using bicycles or walking. There still is a role for the motor car. Roads are necessary in any community. They connect east to west to allow the Rock Road and other alternatives to be used. You need that connectivity. Best practice is that there is a spine road. Any state of this size really needs two access points.

Andrew Hind: Agree strongly that an estate of this size needs two access points. What you do with that spine road in the context of traffic calming is a matter to be determined at the detailed stage.

Cllr D’Alton: At the Astra information session, the message I received was that on Council instruction, the road was straight and to receive no traffic calming. They mentioned Council’s instruction was for curvature of the road to provide for traffic calming.

Ross Palmer: That is not the case. The Masterplan specifically says that this is to be designed as a 30 km/h road. That is a very slow speed indeed. Traffic calming will need to be incorporated at the planning stage.

Cllr D’Alton: Agree that this is indeed slow. Confirming that traffic calming will be sought at the planning stage. (Confirmation received from both Andrew Hind and Ross Palmer.)

Cllr Collins: It is true that house design is important. There are some terraced houses in Heronswood where there is no facility for residents to bring in bins. They look awful with the bins scattered out the front. Also it is said that residents who live north of the Ashgrove roundabout go to shop in Douglas whereas those south of the roundabout shop in Carrigaline. It would be good if we could encourage all residents to shop in Carrigaline.

Andrew Hind: That sort of issue is one which should really be dealt with by the Local Area Plan.

Martin Ryan circulated the proposed alternative wording to deal with the issue of access between the new development and Heronswood:

“2. Insert a bullet point in 1.4.26 as follows:- Where practical, the layout and design of residential areas R-11, R-14 and R-17 allows for connectivity with the existing Herons Wood housing estate to the south. Cork County Council and the Developer will examine the various options at the planning application stage taking account of the role of the Greenway to the east of the site, the views of nearby residents, the Ministerial Section 28 Guidelines on Sustainable Residential Developments in Urban Areas (2009) and the NTA’s Permeability Best Practice Guide.”

 

***We took a short break to discuss options and how we might proceed. The executive left the room and councillors spoke together.

 

During the break, councillors discussed this new proposed wording. Many still not happy with it because it provides residents with no assurances. It is still open ended. Cllr D’Alton proposed alternative wording with which the other councillors were satisfied. However, many councillors still not happy because even if the accessibility issue between Shannonpark and Heronswood is resolved, there are still other issues which remain unaddressed.

The meeting reconvened.

 

Cllr D’Alton read out the following proposed alternative wording:

Connectivity with the existing Herons Wood estate to the south will be provided by the existing Greenway. This will address the Ministerial Section 28 Guidelines on Sustainable Residential Developments in Urban Areas (2009), the NTA’s Permeability Best Practice Guide and concerns of adjacent residents.

She added that this wording responds to the “critical” element of connectivity by defining a connection between the two estates but provides the necessary assurance to residents that points of access will not be through their cul-de-sacs.

Andrew Hind is concerned about that we are going from several red arrows to only one. He says that he will take away the new wording and think about it.

Cllr Forde said that she was satisfied with this wording but that other councillors had other issues. Cllr O’Donnabhain invited councillors to recap on them.

Cllr D’Alton: Other key issues are linking with the N28 upgrade and a commitment to sustainable design being incorporated in the Masterplan.

Cllr McGrath: Other key issue is linking with the N28 upgrade.

Andrew Hind: This wording from the Members is a positive suggestion. Will think about it outside of this meeting.

With regard to sustainable design, the County Council follows national regulation. Going beyond the building regulations is not something we intend to do in particular with this estate. We have addressed all the other issues – flooding, etc. – in the Masterplan. The only one we have not addressed is water conservation. Does not support the view that the construction of the N28 is linked to the development. The independent study commissioned by the Council said that upgrading of the roundabout would be sufficient. Linking the upgrade to the development would be counterproductive because the NRA has said that the N28 upgrade is not to accommodate commuting traffic. We would be giving the wrong signal to government in relation to the N28 upgrade if we were to link the development with the N28 upgrade.

Cllr Canty: Is this to come before full Council on Monday?

Andrew Hind: We have to make a decision on this by 25th January. The other option that is open is that we bring this back to the Development Committee on 15th January where the options for wording can be considered again.

Cllr Forde: You have given your opinion in relation to the N28 issue. Several Members won’t be happy with that and won’t vote for the Masterplan as a result. Would be happy with the permeability wording.  In relation to the housing issue, thinks a lot of the concerns can be addressed within the planning process which we can as a municipal district make a submission to. Some of us here won’t vote for this Masterplan under any circumstance so thinks we have gone as far as we can today.

Cllr Desmond: It is really important that this comes back to us as a Municipal District again. Wants to vote for the Masterplan, not against it. Is very taken aback by the view that the N28 is not to take commuter traffic. This is more of looking at each issue in isolation. Like the consultants telling us the Carrs Hill interchange will not impact on Douglas! The Port development was tied into the N28 upgrade. It is just good planning that the Shannonpark development would be tied in too.

Cllr McGrath: Where are we going from here? A discussion at this forum is far more productive than in a chamber with 55 councillors, all the others of which do not have this development in their core area. It should come back to Municipal District level and then on to full Council.

Andrew Hind will go back to the CE and decide with him whether to bring it to Development Committee or to a Municipal District meeting before bringing it to full Council on 25th January. The Development Committee has a stake in this because it is out of a Development Committee meeting that this meeting arose from. The next Development Committee meeting is 15th January. In the interim, he would like to discuss and think of tweaks to the wording proposed by Cllr D’Alton. He would like to canvas opinion on that on the executive side. Any changes to the proposed wording will be emailed to us in advance of the Development Committee meeting.

This concluded the meeting.

Projects funded countywide under 1916 Commemorative Programme

Full list of groups, their projects, their location and funding awarded: Projects to be funded countywide

  1. Carrigaline Tidy Towns: Garden of Remembrance
    Ballincollig – Cork Nature Network: Irish Nature in 1916 “Creating a Vision 2016”
  2. Ballincollig Twinning Association: Visit of Twinning Partners (Mechterstadt in Germany and Saclay in France) to join in the centenary commemoration of 1916
  3. Carrigaline Community Association: History Through the Ages – A Parade with Reenactments
  4. Kinsale History Society: Kinsale Remembers 1916
    Ballinhassig: John L. O’ Sullivan re-enactment of march, erection of monument
  5. Crosshaven – Camden Fort Meagher:  1916 Commemoration – Remembrance Weekend
  6. ACR Heritage: “Aghabullogue & 1916 – Lectures and an exhibition”
  7. Béal Átha An Ghaorthaidh and Inchigeela Historical Society: Easter Sunday Re-enactment, exhibition and unveiling of plaque
    Carriganima Community Development: “Carriganima Easter Sunday 1916 Commemoration –  On Easter Sunday 1916 one hundred plus Volunteers mobilised at Carriganima, having come from Ballyvourney, Kilnamartyra, Ballinagree and Clondrohid; the  local Carriganima Volunteer Company was also present. It is proposed to re-enact this gathering by contacting representatives/descendants of these volunteers and the gathering will include the unveiling of commemorative plaques and light entertainment”
  8. Blarney: Brian O Donchú publication on Frank Busteed, lecture
    Cúil Aodha: Coiste Litríochta Mhúscraí Comóradh ar ócáid a thuit amach I gCúil Aodha I Mí Iúil 1918
  9. Timothy R. Murray Memorial Plaques, re-enactments, heritage projects and publications
  10. Baile Mhúirne: Mary Keane “A Question of Language” – a Video Exhibition with some of the former attendees of Coláiste Iosagáin in Baile Mhúirne
  11. Kilmurry Historical and Archaeological Association: Commemoration and reenactment of volunteer march through Kilmurry village (teaming up with Ballinhassig Historical Assoc.)
    Múscraí – Coiste Litríochta: Mhúscraí Foillsiú Féilire (Calendar based on 1916 heroes, poets and writers)
  12. Baile Mhúirne: Studio Eas Coille Art Exhibition (showcasing the prominent places in the Múscraí Gaeltacht that featured prominently between 1916 and 1921)
  13. Macroom: Ted Cunningham Cumann na mBan
  14. Baile Mhúirne:   Slí Gaeltacht Mhúscraí Cathaoir Cuimhneachán ar 1916 a thógaint ar Slí Galetahct Mhúscraí (1916 Remembrance Chair along the Muskerrry Walking Way)
    Béal Átha an Ghaorthaidh: Coláiste na Mumhan Oireachtas an Éirí Amach (arts and the Rebellion in Irish and English)
    GDI Productions: Production and Performance of a new play about Michael Collins – working title “The Big Fella”
  15. Cobh: James Connolly Remember Group Cobh Music and Lectures celebrating James Connolly in Cobh
  16. Cobh: Youth Services Documentary Film entitled “Reflections on the 1916 Easter Rising and past connections to present day Cobh”
  17. Knockraha Historical Society: “The Secret Landscape of Knockraha” – War of Independence Heritage Trail
    Cobh 1916 Commemoration Committee: Reenactment of Cobh Volunteers’ assembly and march. This event will see the unveiling of a plaque; the opening of a memorial garden and the erection of a monument
  18. Cobh: Museum Two exhibitions one re Scuttling of the Aud/Queenstown involvement in 1916 and the other on the history of Irish Dance
  19. Cobh: Tourism Ltd Display of Anchor from the Aud with suitable interpretation signage
  20. Cobh: Animation Team Mothers Day Afternoon Tea (Mná na hÉireann/Women of the Rising) Event
  21. Castlemartyr Family Carers and Disability Support Group: A Celebration of the Music and Musicians of 1916 (Ireland and Worldwide)
  22. Killeagh Inch Historical Group: Community Commemorative Event involving local school and relatives of Ristéard Ó Foghlú of Knockmonlea for his contribution to the Irish language and the part he and his family played in 1916
  23. Midelton: Pamela Morrison Documentary looking at the youth’s opinion of the Irish flag, what qualities a leader should have and what they would change about the 1916 proclamation
  24. Youghal: Comhaltas Garden of Remembrance
  25. Youghal Celebrates History: Youghal 2016 – Degrees of Seperation (Seminar and Publication)
  26. Matthew McAteer: Discovering the People Featured in the Horgan Film Collection circa 1916
    Ballymacoda Ladysbridge Community Council: Centenary Remembrance and Celebration
  27. Rostellan Development Association: “Thomas Kent Memorial Park” and community gathering with music and display of dancing, etc.
  28. Youghal Comhaltas: Musical Pageant on the Young Life of James Connolly
  29. Castlelyons Bridesbridge Tidy Towns and Heritage Group: 1916 Trees of Remembrance
  30. Fermoy St. Colman’s College: Thomas McDonagh Plaque at school where he once taught
  31. Glanworth Players Community Theatre Group: Commissioning and Stating of Play entitled “The Wearing of the Motley” – written to commemorate those throughout the country who were primed to join the Easter rising, but who ultimately did not due to the countermanding order
  32. Glanworth Community Council: Garden of Remembrance
    Kildorrery Community Development Association: Erecting a Monument and associated Events
  33. Ballyhoura Development: Military Graveyards Project
    Conna Community Council: Special Events including Military Ceremony
  34. Castlelyons Community Council & Barrymore Players Drama Group: “The Kents of Bawnard” – A Drama Production
    Charleville Heritage Society: commemorating the Charleville Battalion (Old I.R.A.) by inscribing their names on a panel to be erected in the Garden of Remembrance, plaque to Éamon de Valera
  35. Fermoy 1916 Commemoration Committee: Parade, laying of wreath, Garden of Remembrance, souvenir programme
    Castlelyons 1916 Commemoration Committee: Cork County ‘Ireland 2016’ Commemorative Ceiliuradh at Castlelyons
    Bruach na Carraige Cultural and Heritage Centre: “The Path to 1916” – A Commomoration in music (song and dance) by Ceoltoirí Sliabh Luachra
  36. St. Brendan’s N. S. Rathcoole: “A Celebration of Life in 1916”
    Mallow Field Club: Digitisation of 25 past Mallow Field Club Journals
  37. Mallow Field Club Lecture
  38. Bernard Moynihan Commemoration Committee: Memorial/plaque and lecture
  39. Millstreet Country Park: Historical Trail(guided tours), Festival, statues
  40. Freemount 1916 Commemoration Committee: memorial, garden of remembrance and publication
  41. Mourneabbey Community Council: Mourneabbey Community 2016 Centenary Celebrations
  42. Kilbrin Community Council: A weekend of celebreations and dress of the time, memorials and plaques
  43. Newmarket Development Association / Duhallow Heritage Society: Lasair na Saoirse – A Duhallow Garden of Remembrance
  44. Duhallow Choral Society: “The Risen People” Duhallow Remembers
  45. Cullen 1916 Committee: memorial and garden of remembrance involving local schools
  46. Millstreet Monument Committee: Lecture, Publication launch, plaque and monument
  47. Kiskeam Brass Band: Restart the Kiskeam Brass Band
  48. Boherbue 1916 Centenary Commemoration Committee: Gathering, Plaque, exhibit, art installation and TV documentary and booklet
  49. Domina Commemorative Committee: ‘Who We Are’ Dromina 1916-2016 Commemorative Community Festival
  50. Mallow Development Partnership: Various – Exhibition, “Irish Night”, unveiling of plaque to Volunteers, Remembrance Garden; showing of Movie Wind That Shakes the Barley
  51. Beara Historical Society: Erection and unveiling of plaque to Padraig O’ Laoghaire, Gaelic League scholar and author and the Irish teacher of Padraig Pearse
  52. Colm Scully and Conor MacManus: “Breakfast with Padraig” Spoken Word and Film Performance
  53. Oileán Cléire: Éamon Lankford Remembrance Ceremony at Sea (off Gascannane Rock where O’ Donovan Rossa is said to have composed some famous lines of Irish poetry), exhibition
  54. Clonakilty Historical Society: erection of memorial, publish a historical journal on the Lyre Company
  55. West Cork Oral Heritage: Oral History Project
  56. Castletownbere Scoil Phobail Bhéara: Oral History Project
  57. Clonakilty:  Conradh Na nGaeilge Cnoch Na gCoillte refurbishment of grave of Máire Ní Shíthe in (Gaelic Authoress)Timoleague, erection of a plaque in Clonakilty
  58. Inchigeela Tidy Towns: Garden of Remembrance. Inchigeela Tidy Towns will undertake a garden of remembrance
  59. Cork County Council: Michael Collins House Permanent exhibition reflecting the life of Michael Collins from his birth in Woodfield to his death at Beal na mBlath.
  60. West Cork Maritime Heritage Company: Exhibition of Fishing Vessel  “The Free State” – the first fishing boat to be registered in Cork at Independence, Registration No “C 1”
  61. Courtmacsherry St. Patricks Day Festival Committee: week long historical and cultural festival event with strong Irish language aspect
  62. Oileán Cléire: Éamon Lankford publication in Irish and English of John K. Cotter’s poems as well as a lecture and the Cape Clear connection with the landing of guns from the Asgard
  63. Bantry Historical Society: Reenactment march and historical lecture
  64. Ardfield National School: Garden of Remembrance, exhibition of children’s projects, lectures, re-enactments
  65. Rosscarbery National Committee: Remembrance Parade and Commemoration of Easter Rising (particular mention of Michael Collins and Seán Hayes)
  66. West Cork Arts Centre: 1916 to 2016 – 100 years in History and Art (Working title
  67. Skibbereen & District Chamber of Commerce: 2016 St. Patrick’s Day Parade/Pageant
  68. Skibbereen 1916 Commemoration Committee: Commemoration of both Gearóid Ó Suilleabháin (raised Tricolor over GPO) and Jeremiah O’ Donovan Rossa
  69. Skibbereen Arts Festival: The People’s Museum of Skibbereen 1916 – 2016
  70. William Rossa Cole: “Rossa Irish Rebel” – a documentary film
  71. Bantry Development and Tourism Association: “Bantry Celebrates and Commemorates:  A  community commemorative event will take place in Bantry over Easter Weekend 2016. Activities will include historical lectures, an exhibition of memorabilia and photographs, musical performances, church ceremonies and a children’s art camp entitled “Remembering the Past”
  72. Clonakilty Duchas Heritage: Clonakilty Community 1916 Events
  73. Cork County Council – Architects Redevelopment of Béal na Bláth Site to include on-site interpretation
  74. Drinagh Seán Ó Muirthile Historical Society: Seán Hurley Commemoration Day
  75. Cork City and County Archives Book for the 1916 Easter Rising Centenary based on documents for the 1912 – 1918 period held in the Cork City and County Archives
  76. Cork Genealogical Society: Genealogy Conference “Your Family in 1916”
  77. Uileann Ceol: Ancestral Connections – Roots to the Rising 2016 in association with the Irish genealogy Summer School, University College, Cork
  78. Cork County Council – Library: The Culture and Entertainment of 1916 (variety event with song, poetry and drama)
  79. Ortús Chamber Music Festival: Commission and Performance of a new chamber music work “Pause” by Sam Perkin in commemoration of the 1916 Rising

My motion to full Council on the Strategic Infrastructure Act, 14th December 2015

Motion:
“That a planning application to An Bord Pleanala made under the Strategic Infrastructure Act can be made no more than twice for the same nature of project on the same site.”

Projects that are really big; projects like an incinerator, a landfill, an airport, a port, a refinery, a power station, a super-large wind farm don’t follow normal planning permission procedures. They follow the procedures outlined in the Strategic Infrastructure Act of 2006. Such projects have massive potential to impact on both humans and the environment. So companies proposing these projects can spend up to two years in pre-planning consultation with An Bord Pleanala and a further year and more preparing the necessary planning documentation.

When the planning application is advertised, the public – those most at risk of impact – have 6 weeks within which to make a submission. So they put aside their lives, spend every waking minute interpreting the technical data that it took specialised consultants and year and more to prepare and submit their expressions of fear to the Board with the requisite fee.

When the Board is ready, it calls an oral hearing. Again, the public – those who are most at risk of impact – put their lives on hold. Frantic recruiting of grannies and childminders, hasty booking of time off work, postponing business appointments, rescheduling plans. Panic-stricken seeking of experts who may back their concerns and fears with technical data. Research and preparation each night into the early hours of each morning.

An oral hearing can take anything from a few days to a few weeks. The company proposing the project does not have to be present. Their evidence is generally delivered by their consultants and managed by their legal representatives. The concerned public who were lucky enough to find childminders and get time off work attend all day every day. Those who were less lucky pop in and out during lunch hour and any time during the working day that they can. All go home in the evening, catch up on normal daily life and when that normal daily life is over, prepare for the following day’s hearing.

After the oral hearing is over and generally after several months of a wait, the Board delivers a verdict. If a project is refused permission to proceed, the concerned public is much relieved but their work is not done. They must now start fund-raising to pay for experts they may have employed to support them in the oral hearing. In some communities, this fund-raising can go on for years, so the legacy of a project stays with a community long after it has been refused.

But a company proposing a strategic infrastructure project invests heavily in a site and has tremendous hopes for the profits that project may bring. It will not let this investment go to waste. So some years later, the company tweaks the planning application and begins the process again.

The impact on the community is phenomenal. A community can rarely garner the same level of public support the second time round. People are tired and still in the process of recovering their lives years after the first application. But they rally, draining themselves of their energy and resources in the process.

Some communities in our county are enduring this merry go round, not for the second, but for the third time. They are fighting a third variation of the same project, on the same site, already refused twice by the Board. Can you even imagine the impact on those communities? The planning process was designed to be democratic. To repeatedly apply for permission for a development in this way is neither constructive nor democratic. It is simply bullying.

For the sake of democracy, fairness and communities, I ask this Council’s support to request of the Minister that the planning acts be amended so that a planning application to the board under the Strategic Infrastructure Act can be made no more than twice for the same nature of project on the same site.

Notes from a meeting of Cork County Council, 14th December 2015

Meeting of Cork County Council, 14th December 2015

[a]           CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES

1.  Minutes of Meeting of the Council held on 23rd November, 2015.

Cllr Hegarty (FG) would like amendment to page 9 – Waterrock and Carrigtwohill Masterplan – “which will include”.

Minutes proposed and seconded.

CE: Capital budget will be 2nd meeting in January.

 

[b]           VOTES OF SYMPATHY

2.  Votes of Sympathy (if any) to the relatives of:

  • members or employees of the Council,
  • dignitaries of Church or State, or
  • members of old I.R.A. and Cumann na mBan.

Votes of sympathy from:
Cllr Murphy O’Mahony (FF)
Cllr Dawson (FG)
Cllr Doyle (FF)
Cllr McGrath (FF)
Cllr McCarthy (FG)

Cllr Murphy (FG) welcomes Cllr Noel McCarthy (formerly Lab) to Fine Gael.  Speaks about his vast experience.  FG started off with 16, now we’re 17 and the door is always open for others!

Cllrs Collins (Ind) and O’Keeffe (FF) also spoke.

Cllr O’Keeffe (FF) asked for a suspension of standing orders at 1pm to discuss the recent Paris agreement on climate change.

 

[c]            STATUTORY BUSINESS

3.  Disposal of Property: Section 183 of the Local Government Act, 2001:

Ballincollig/Carrigaline Municipal District, 16th November, 2015:
(a).          Grant of Wayleave at Bramble Hill, Castletreasure, Co. Cork.

 East Cork Municipal District, 7th September, 2015:
(b).          Disposal of 2 Woodview Court, Youghal, Co. Cork.
(c).          Disposal of 27 Rosary Place, Midleton, Co. Cork.
(d).          Disposal of lands at Laurence Kelly Terrace, Killeagh, Co. Cork.
(e).          Disposal of 10 Raheen Park, Youghal, Co. Cork.
(f).           Disposal of 43 Rosary Place, Midleton, Co. Cork.
(g).          Disposal of 2 & 3 McAllister Way, Castlemagner, Co. Cork.(h).         Disposal of 52 Liam McGearailt Place, Fermoy, Co. Cork.

(i).            Amendment to Disposal of The Quadrants, Ballincollig, by the substitution of “Co-Operative Housing Ireland” in lieu of “NABCO” being the persons to whom the properties are to be disposed.

(j).            Amendment to Disposal of Lands (5.857 acres) at Little Island, Co. Cork, by the substitution of “Patrick O’Driscoll” in lieu of “Val & Patrick O’Driscoll” being the person to whom the property is to be disposed.

Proposed and seconded.

 

4.  Section 4(2) and Sections 32-35 of the Local Community Development Committee (Section 128E) Regulations 2014 (SI No. 234 of 2014):
Filling of casual vacancy on the West Cork Local Community Development Committee

“A casual vacancy has arisen on the West Cork LCDC. In accordance with the provisions of Section 4(2) and Sections 32-35 of the Local Community Development Committee (Section 128E) Regulations 2014 (SI No. 234 of 2014), the approval of the members is sought for the appointment of Mr. Kevin Curran, Substitute Head of LEO as a replacement representative for Local Enterprise Office on the West Cork LCDC. The previous nominee Mr. Michael Hanley is hereby de-selected.”

Proposed and seconded.

 

5.  Section 5 of the Arterial Drainage Acts 1945 & 1995:   Consideration of and observations in regard to the proposed River Bride (Blackpool) Certified Drainage Scheme.

Report from the CE: Blackpool Drainage OPW

CE: This is a scheme that is advertised by the OPW for Blackpool. There is an opportunity for Council to make its observations on this scheme by early February. Council staff will give a briefing to the relevant Municipal District. 

 

[d]           FINANCIAL BUSINESS

6.  “That Cork County Council is authorised to borrow by way of overdraft a sum not exceeding €10m for the twelve month period ending 31st December, 2016, subject to the sanction of the Minister for the Environment and Local Government.”

Proposed and seconded.

 

[e]           REPORTS & RECOMMENDATIONS OF COMMITTEES

7.  Corporate Policy Group:

(a).          Approval of attendance by Council members at Conferences on the Conference List for December, 2015 approved by the Corporate Policy Group at their meeting on the 8th December, 2015.

Proposed and seconded.

 

 

(b).          Nomination of Member to the Board of the Crawford Art Gallery.

Letter from Dept of Arts, Heritage & Gaeltacht: Crawford Art Gallery

Claire Cullinane proposed by Cllr Hurley (Ind)
Susan McCarthy proposed by Cllr Murphy (FG)

Vote taken: Cullinane – 20; McCarthy – 23

 

 

(c).          Approval of Financial Contribution of €10,000 to Cork City Sports.

Proposed and seconded.

Cllr Conway (Ind): Recognition should be given on the day to Cork County Council contribution. No recognition was given on the day last year. Recognition was given to City Council only.

Cllr Canty (FG): We have always given a grant to Cork City Sports when we are asked. We present at one event only but we’re giving money and although it is a great thing for Cork City, the recognition we get is very minimal. Same with Cork Opera House. Time that the Cork City Sports Committee – who do great work – must acknowledge Cork County Council’s contribution.

 

8.  Development Committee:
“That Cork County Council supports the principles set out in the Irish Congress of Trade Unions Charter for Fair Conditions of Work.”

This motion arose from a presentation given to the Development Committee. Supported.

Cllr O’Grady (SF): When Cork County Council does business with outside contractors, please try to endeavour that they are in compliance with the Charter.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): Cork County Council should do what it can to support this in a practical way. We have already spoken about Gateway and a fair day’s work for a fair day’s pay. Public authorities should lead the way in terms of workers’ rights for a living wage.

 

9.  1916 Commemoration Committee: Approval of grants under Cork County Council’s 2016 Centenary Programme

Projects under the 2016 Centenary Programme: 2016 UPDATE

 

Cllr O’Flynn introduced this as chairperson of the 1916 committee. Spoke about the tremedous array of projects which have been grant-funded for 1916 commemoration.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF) and others commend Conor Nelligan, Cork County Council.

 

10.  Kanturk/Mallow Municipal District:
REPORT UNDER SECTION 179 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT ACT 2000 – Traffic Calming Scheme R620 and L9045 at Gooldshill, Mallow, Co. Cork.

CE’s report: Gooldshill Mallow Part 8 Managers Report Nov15

Proposed and seconded.

 

11.  Environment & Emergency Services SPC:
“That Cork County Council condemns the recent announcement by the ESB that;   

  • From the 1st January next free access to electric vehicle charging points is to be removed
  • A monthly fee for such access is to be introduced
  • Additional per charge fees are to apply to use of high-speed three-phase charging points

The Council views the introduction of these charges as being unjustified and untenable and completely at odds with a policy that seeks to increase the use of electric vehicles.

The Council asks that the charges be immediately rescinded and that furthermore, so as to bring clarity to existing and potential users, a period of years be specified during which no such charges will be introduced.”

Cllr Murphy introduced the motion as chairperson of the SPC.

Cllr M Hegarty (FG): Totally supports. The ESB’s move defeats the whole purpose. Even the initial cost of electric cars is substantial.

Cllr Canty (FG): Chicken and egg situation. At the moment there is a charge and who is going to pay for the electricity in the long run? There has to be a charge because the ordinary electricity user will pay for it. If I drive my car I have to pay for petrol. At the end of the day, someone will pay for it and it will be the ordinary people who will end up paying for it through their taxes, etc.

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Also a member of the Environment SPC and entirely supports what Cllr Murphy has said. Transport makes up more than 20% of our entire national greenhouse gas emissions. It is also the area of fastest growth in emissions. In the last 25 years – since the early 1990s – the number of cars on our roads has gone up 150%. Our transport is 99% dependent on imported fuels. This costs the country about €3.5 billion every year. Under the Renewable Energy Supply Directive, Ireland is obliged to have 10% of transport energy coming from renewable sources by 2020. So the government set a target of having 230,000 cars on the road to be electric by 2020.  But at the current rate of purchase, only about 50,000 electric cars will be on Irish roads by 2020 – miles short of our target. One of the reason for this is that the Nissan Leaf, one of the most popular electric cars, has a theoretical maximum range of 200km but a real maximum range of 120km. So if you are driving from Cork to Dublin you have to stop to charge? The batteries are not sufficiently developed to go the whole journey in one go. You cannot slow charge: that takes overnight, so you use a fast charging point in a garage. But in Ireland, there are only about 150 fast charging points available publicly. And now the price of using these fast charging points is going up. Why would we penalise those who are willing to take the inconvenience and make that extra effort to drive a cleaner car? In Norway, the goal was to reach 50,000 zero emissions vehicles by 2018. Their incentives to drive electric cars have been so successful that by September this year, they had over 66,000 of them on the road. Way past their national target. But in Ireland, we are not even close to reaching ours.

Cllr Hayes (SF): We have to incentivise people if we have to make a change. This needs a huge change of direction. With the Paris summit, we are going to be penalised for not meeting our targets. Is working with a group in West Cork who is offering a taxi service using electric cars. Very positive initiative. We have to put the infrastructrure in place to support the use of electric cars.

Cllr Coleman (Ind): Supports. If we had filling stations charging you to come into the filling station first and then charging you for the fuel as well, it would be totally unacceptable.

Cllr McGrath (FF):   Not merely do we have to import transport, spoke also of localised exhaust emissions from petrol and diesel vehicles which cause local respiratory issues. We need to encourage alternative modes of transport that do not rely on fossil fuels and so supports the motion.

Cllr Forde (FG): Local government was recognised as having a pivotal role in determining the outcome of what we will achieve arising from the Paris summit. Whatever we decide locally will be of utmost importance and those at national level will have to recognise that. All week when the media was talking about the flooding, not one associated the flooding with climate change. We always heard that people were not doing enough. There is a responsibility on every one of us and the Council should have programmes at local level to highlight this.

Motion passed and we will write to the ESB.

 

12.  Tourism SPC:
Approval of Draft Trails for Tourism – A Policy to maximise the economic benefit to the County.

Draft Trails Policy: Trails for Tourism Report December 8th

Cllr Coleman (Ind): Introduces as chairperson of the Tourism SPC. The aim of the policy is to maximise the economic benefit of trails to the county. The draft policy has eight key proposals. The appointment of a Trails Coordinator is the most important of these. We are hoping a European project we are involved in will fund this. That will propel the policy into a reality. It would be good both for the people of the county and for tourism. The aim is to try to make Cork a centre for walking tourism. Particularly want to focus on family-centric and child-friendly trails. Refers to the Lake District and how they have optimised on this.

Cllr Conway (Ind): Welcomes the document. There seems to be a deficit of trails in Cork. Take the source of the River Lee all the way to Cork Harbour: there is massive potential there to develop trails for cycling, walking and others. Is hoping these will be thought of as the trails policy develops. Wishes the Tourism SPC the best with this.

Cllr M Hegarty (FG): Welcomes the document. Sheeps Head walk is worth €18m to the local economy. Hopes we will see a Camino type walk in Cork in due course with all the trails linked up.

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Draft policy is very good. Refers to the National Trails Office register. Was very disappointed to see that the National Trails Office register does not have any cycling trails in County Cork marked at all, even though we have some excellent both on road and off road trails.

Cllr Canty (FG): Congratulates those who put draft policy together. A few trails are indeed left out but these can be amended. Spoke of Ballincollig trail. Document will be ready for the incoming tourist season.

Cllr PG Murphy (FF): Many of our trails have been recently fitted with counters. The counter at Dursey Island showed the highest amount of passers of any walks in Ireland. We need to provide the services associated with walkers as we are expanding the trails.

Cllr Hayes (SF): Delighted to see this coming together in the last few months. West Cork is very proud of its natural heritage. This is a way of putting it all together, increasing signage, etc. Will be a very impressive package to bring to the market. The Sheep’s Head Way is very positive and the Clonakilty Cycle Scheme will be expanded next year.

Mayor: Very inspirational document and will be great for the county in terms of its future.

CE: Commends the staff for taking this opportunity in conjunction with the SPC. Key to this is not just listing what trails we have but linking the various elements of the tourism product we have to the trails. We are fully supportive of the partnership approach taken to this. We need to capture and brand. We are starting to emerge as a leader in tourism development. Looking forward to working on this going forward.

Cllr Coleman (Ind): Acknowledging the work put in by Louis, Rose and the team in putting this together.

Taking all flooding motions together:

 

13.  West Cork Municipal District:
“The Members of the Municipal District of West Cork call on the OPW to review the existing Arterial Drainage Districts in West Cork to assess their capacity to cope with severe weather events”.

 

14.  Bandon/Kinsale Municipal District:
“This Council calls on the Office of Public Works to engage in the following manner with the members of the Municipal District of Bandon Kinsale in relation to the proposed Bandon Flood Relief scheme: –

1. to meet urgently with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District and give an update on the progress of the scheme to date
2. to identify any interim works that can be carried out, before the main scheme is completed to alleviate any possible future flooding
3. to carry out interim works indentified
4. to give a project progress time line to the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District outlining the key milestones in the project and when they are expected to be delivered
5. to meet with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District and provide regular updates on the progress of the scheme.

This Council also calls on Simon Harris T.D., Minister of State at the Departments of Finance, Public Expenditure and Reform and the Department of the Taoiseach with Special Responsibility for the OPW, Public procurement, and International Banking (incl. IFSC) to ensure that the Office of Public Works engages as set out above with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District.

Bandon Main Drainage

This Council calls on Irish Water to engage in the following manner with the members of the Municipal District of Bandon Kinsale in relation to the proposed Bandon Main Drainage Scheme: –  

  1. to meet urgently with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District and give an update on the progress of the scheme to date
  2. to give a project progress time line to the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District outlining the key milestones in the project and when they are expected to be delivered
  3. to meet on a regular basis with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District and give updates on the progress of the scheme

This Council also calls on Alan Kelly, T.D., Minister for the Environment, Community and Local Government to ensure that Irish Water engages as set out above with the members of the Bandon Kinsale Municipal District.”

 

24.  Councillor Rachel McCarthy:
“That this Council acknowledges the damage caused to businesses & homes in Bandon as a result of the flooding on Saturday 5th December. In relation to same, that the businesses which have been affected will immediately be exempt from paying rates until such a time that the Main Drainage and Flood Relief schemes have been delivered for the town.”

 

Councillor Michael Collins:
“I call on the Cork County Council to provide emergency funds for businesses severely effected in the last number weeks and months by flooding either to their business premises or to roads leading to their businesses. These people who are paying rates and employing people have had a serious loss of income due to these major disruptions.   I call on the Cork County Council to grant aid these businesses through a fund like the town development fund or if not freeze rates for these people until they get back on their feet again. It is in the interest of the Cork County Council that we give all the support we can to these businesses so they can continue to carry on through this difficult time.”

Cllr J O’Donovan (FG): Introduced the Bandon-Kinsale Municipal District motion as the chari of the Bandon-Kinsale Municipal District. There was an emergency meeting in Bandon Town Hall last week.   The Council is at the mercy of the OPW on the Bandon flood relief scheme. We want an up-to-date progress report on the scheme to date. We want interim works which can be done to be identified. Because the scheme will take two years even if it gets the go-ahead. It has to go ahead in May. We want that confirmation. We want regular updates every 6 months so we are not kept in the dark as we have been all along. We are meeting with Simon Harris later and we are also asking him to urge the OPW to meet with us.

The second half of the motion deals with Irish Water and the main drainage. We now understand it is being pushed out again. This scheme cannot be pushed out any more. It needs to go ahead in tandem with the flood relief scheme. Bandon is being held to ranson. It can’t surface roads, it can’t do anything. We want to meet with Irish Water.

Glad of the €5m put in by the Red Cross. Commends the staff in Cork County Council who worked through the night to help the local traders. Thanks all those who were involved, including the traders and the people of Bandon. Last night, the Friends of Bandon organised an event. It was very well supported and the Christmas spirit was restored.

It is key that we will no longer be held in the dark with regard to commencment dates for both schemes. We need answers and progress.

Cllr Murphy O’Mahony (FF): Sat Dec 5th, Bandon was badly flooded again, five and a half years after flood relief was promised. We have had legal challenges, design changes and start-stop situations.   Both of the two schemes were to have run in tandem. They have – the tandem of zero delivery. Previous flood victims cannot get insurance. People live in fear of flooding. The town is held to ransom. The OPW and Irish Water need to act. Will also be fighting to get the flood relief works in Skibbereen commenced.

Cllr O’Sullivan (FF): Speaking on Item 13 on the agenda. After the September/October heavy rainfall, it came to light that the engineers who came to the Municipal District meetings shared our concerns with regard to the prospect of more rainfall. There was much Council money spent in emergency works after these rainfall events and there was a fear that they would all be washed away in the next rainfall event. They were. The old Arterial Drainage Scheme would go a long way towards preventing more damage to roads. Supports those in the Bandon-Kinsale Municipal District. Message needs to go loud and clear to government. Drainage works are being carried out in Clonakilty in terms of surface water on the street. Even still, people of Clonakilty were on edge during the recent storm events.

Cllr R McCarthy (SF): We watched the water resurface on the streets of Bandon with horror. Had just been elected to Bandon Town Council in 2009 when the last major flooding happened. Had no faith in the dates we were given at that time with regard to implementation of the flood relief scheme and that has sadly come to be true. The dates Irish Water delivered last week were horrifying. They will not be going to tender until 2016, with the contract awarded in February 2017. Possibly the main drainage will be finished in 2018. That’s a disgrace after waiting since 2009. We acknowledge the flooding in other areas and our thoughts are with those affected but we have to look to our own and support the businesses in the town. People came to march on the streets and that wasn’t just traders. A great show of solidarity. Hoping for a good meeting with Simon Harris today. There are 60 businesses in Bandon petitioning on a no floods relief, no rates basis. They are looking for an investment in Bandon.

Cllr M Collins (Ind): Calls on Cork County Council to have a serious look at the situation we have found ourselves in in the last number of months. We have had flooding in Mizen, Goleen and Crookhaven which had a serious impact on businesses. They literally closed down.   Doesn’t call for rates relief lightly. This is what the people are asking for. They are under severe pressure leading to loss of jobs and closure of their business. The Town Development Fund perhaps should be looked at as a compensatory package. Welcomes that Simon Harris is coming to West Cork.   Welcomes the compensatory packages that have been put in place but there are many who need help from those packages that it is not reaching. If some of these businesses go out of business there is a loss to the Council. If we can’t pull off a rates rebate, we should examine what we can do through the Town Development Fund.

Cllr Coleman (Ind): The flood relief scheme has been in the tender prcess since November 2013. It is being managed by the OPW and their consultants. Is there incompentence there that the tender was legally challenged? The OPW and their consultants backed down in court – that indicates that they were wrong. This has been repoted as being a very poorly managed tender process. There may well be further leaks in the process. With respect to Irish Water and the main drainage proposals, since Irish Water took this project over, they have been constantly moving the goalposts. Their consultants are now talking about reviewing the mains water pipe going through the town. There is a proposal for a rates freeze but both schemes are being funded out of the national purse, not the local purse. Would prefer to look at relief on VAT and income tax which is what is really funding these schemes. That is where will hurt the most.

Cllr Murphy (FG): Cork County Council has come under a lot of blame for the flooding in Bandon. They should be exonerated. The OPW has a huge role to play here in informing the members who will in turn inform the traders and residents of Bandon. Agrees that the delays are unacceptable. We need to contact Irish Water immediately and agrees with the sentiments expressed so far by all the members.

Cllr M Hegarty (FG): Welcomes the Minister who is coming to Skibbereen. Hopes to speak first hand on what we have said already. Arterial drainage is very important. Would like to see a scheme like the arterial drainage scheme put in place again. Our engineers are doing everything they can but this is an opportune time this afternoon to speak to our Minister. Feels for the traders because this is the busiest time of the year.

Cllr PG Murphy (FF): It appears the OPW is not fit for purpose. This is not the first time. They have also made a mess of dealing with old buildings. We need to plan for these events. They will happen and we know they are going to happen.

Cllr Hayes (SF): Gives support to all the motions on the floor on this topic. Send sympathies especially to the residents in Bandon. Very upsetting to see people losing so much of their livelihoods. Commends the Council and emergency services who helped. We need to put pressure on the OPW. Is pleased to see Minister Harris visiting Bandon and Skibbereen today. We have had huge frustration in both towns and the buck stops with the OPW. There have also been cuts of €16m to the OPW in recent years. This is not helping. Asks that the Minister would provide the €40k needed to provide pumps for the Dunmanway area in particualr. At present, the area is being kept pumped through the goodwill of local contractors. Had a motion to the Municipal District last year about clearing of rivers. All these measures help.

Cllr Lombard (FG): Concurs with all sentiments. Yesterday’s street festival was a great credit to Bandon and to those who supported them. A meeting with the Irish Water officials and with the OPW is very important. The districts need to move with these people to progress the situation. The flood relief scheme is a €25m project from the OPW. It needs to be driven forward.

Cllr Hurley (Ind): This is a very serious debate that comes up time and time again. Ministers Kelly and Harris need to be here to listen. We are six years waiting for flood relief schemes that have still not yet started. We hear now there is another year at least before the Bandon scheme goes to tender. There is massive silting of the rivers. The Minister should not leave West Cork today without commiting that work will be done on the ground.

Cllr A Moynihan (FF): There is substantial funding left unspent and it is so frustrating for local residents and traders. Low cost cleaning, etc. is valuable but it is not enough. The overall flood defence is really what is needed. We need to see those overall flood defences advanced, whether on the Lee or whatever.

Mayor: Spoke in sympathy with the people.

CE: Circulated a report which details our level of preparedness, our response, etc. Such a report is normally done after a major event like this. Cork County Council was working all weekend to assess the situation because the severe weather had not gone away. We had expected this weekend to be worse. It was controllable, partly because the rain did not fall as heavily as expected and partly because of people’s efforts on the ground. This impact was not just in Bandon and Skibbereen; it was all over the county. The number of people impacted in the county is probably the highest in the country. Commends all those in Cork County Council and our fire and emergency services. Civil defence is also part of our organisation. Important that the work of our own staff does not get lost in the response of the other agencies. Knows some staff were up for 24 and 48 hours. Knows many business people were also. We need clarity on what the next phases are. Bandon and Skibbereen flood relief schemes are probably the most advanced in the country. They are both out to tender and tenders are due in in January. The next 5 – 6 months are critical for both of those schemes. The need to communicate is paramount. We will write on foot of the motion to the OPW. Knows from discussions at the highest level with the OPW that the need for communication is recognised. The government’s humanitarian scheme is targeted at small businesses that have been unable to get flood insurance. Will be administered through the Red Cross. The government will make initial payments prior to Christmas to return buildings to their pre-flood condition. The scheme does not give compensation. It is targeted at small businesses with up to 20 employees.   There is a link to this on the Cork County Council website. Compensation is capped at €20k. There are qualifications. Applications under the scheme will be made to the relevant local authority.

On rates: We get through times like this as an organisation. We have always been respectful of businesses. Business needs also to recognise that Cork County Council provides an excellent service, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The businesses funds pay for this. The flooding is not Cork County Council’s fault. We can put in place a range of flexible measures to help businesses in difficulty. Legally we would struggle to do it and as an organisation we have never done it. Emergency funds have been put in place by government – rightly so. We have already responded to a specific request from the Bandon-Kinsale Municipal District over the weekend. There is a case for examining what the Town Development Fund can do. Any business that has been impacted negatively and has a difficulty in paying rates, contact us and we will come to an arrangement with them. Cork County Council is not the body that has not performed in this sitaution. We performed admirably and we will continue to do so.

Cllr J O’Donovan (FG): Thanks everyone. Hopes we can go on and talk to the OPW and to Irish Water.

Cllr R McCarthy (SF): Is aware the rates system is an old one. The request for a stop on rates came from the traders themselves. If the traders cannot trade because of their overheads and outgoings, …. We don’t want to see any businesses close. The €5k went a long way. Is there something we can do through the Economic Development Fund to support businesses specifically? We need a support mechanism in place for businesses. Cork County Council did have involvement until 2013 with the main drainage. 

 

I had to leave the Chamber for a few minutes.

  

[f]           REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF OFFICERS

14.  Consideration of the Chief Executive’s Report on Submissions Received to the Proposed Amendment No. 2 to the Bantry E.A. Local Area Plan 2011 – Retail Development in Bantry Town.

 

[g]           CORRESPONDENCE FROM GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

15.  Department of Social Protection:
Letter dated 26th November, 2015, in response to Council’s letter of 21st September, regarding those who are unemployed and not on the Live Register.

Letter from the Dept of Social Protection: Dept of Social Protection

Noted.

 

[h]           NOTICES OF MOTION

 16.  Councillor Joe Harris:
“That this Council register it extreme concern at the targeting of young people by the Gambling industry through aggressive marketing both on and off line. Furthermore that this Council communicate to the government that urgent action must be taken to protect people from the massive onslaught through all forms of media advertising that promote gambling.”
 

Cllr Harris (Ind): Online gambling addiction is equivalent to crack cocaine. Massive advertising campaign on TV during sporting events is obscene. Targets young adults in particular. Addiction clinics are reporting a massive increase. People on lower incomes are more vulnerable. Property and social crimes increase. There are mental and emotional issues to the families involved. Asking that the Council would register its extreme concern at this. This issue seems to be completely ignored and the feedback is that it is becoming a major problem.

Cllr Conway (Ind): Supports and seconds the motion. We are all aware of the effect this has on young people.

We will write to the Department.

 

17.  Councillor Des O’Grady:
“That this Council calls for the establishment of a Housing Co-Ordination Task Force for the supply of Social and Private Housing in Cork. The task force to comprise of representatives from the Department of the Environment, Community and Local Government, the Department of Finance, both Cork Local Authorities, Irish Water, the National Transport Authority, NAMA and Voluntary Housing Agencies as well as elected members from both City and County Councils.”  

Cllr O’Grady (SF): Is disappointed to see how many councillors are not present in the Chamber. This is a very serious situation. There has been very little action taken since this crisis really kicked in. There is a shortfall of over 10,000 homes. Targets continually fail to be met. There are no greenfield development lands available in the city. There is only modest availablility of brownfield lands. Spoke of Docklands and Mahon – will take years to develop. Future housing need in the county is to be undertaken by private developers in nine Masterplan sites. Some have been in the planning process for more than 10 years with no progress. Some have fragmented land ownership which creates huge challenges for their development. As a long term strategy, masterplans may help. But they will not alleviate the current crisis. Private developers are facing huge constraints to the provision of housing. Constructing on some already-zoned land is not financially viable. Getting Irish Water to provide infrastructure is a problem. The old model of relying on developing levys to frontload infrastructure is no longer an option due to cost. Cork County Council will build some small scale housing developments but Council policy says that Council should be aimed towards housing management rather than housing construction. The voluntary housing agencies central unit has been disbanded. Was located in the Department of the Environment. The housing associations say they cannot fulfil their role because of the lack of coordination, …

Minister Kelly set up a Dublin Housing Supply Task Force in 2014. Now a Delivery Task Force has been estalbished to build on the recommendations of that. We don’t have the time to do a two-stage approach such as they have in Dublin. We need to free the present bottleneck as it is clear the present strategy is not working. We need a coordinating body that will have the ear of government.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): Agrees with what Cllr O’Grady has said. He has put the issues very well. Cork Simon is dealing with 12 people sleeping rough every night in the last year. There has been a 35% increase in those sleeping rough.   This is not just a social crisis. Lack of housing is going to become a strategic issue. The County Council’s Metropolitan area does not get adequate recognition in terms of the difficulty of housing supply. It has implications for Cork’s economy also.

Cllr Forde (FG): Supports this motion. The CE has said there was potential to deliver housing. It could not be delivered overnight but will happen. Has a particular problem in relation to NAMA and receivers and the land they control. Receivers were interacting with the Planning Policy Unit. We were told they would come back to us and report on whether there was an improvement in circumstances. Had particularly asked that a receiver inolved in the Ballincollig Carrigaline Municipal District would come to the Municipal District meeting. Is there any feedback? We had a national building agency which was disbanded in an attempt to do away with quangos. There would be potential for a regional or county strategic task force. We have to have some positive outcome in relation to the delivery of houses. The setting up of a task force can only be for the good.

Cllr McGrath (FF): As chair of the housing SPC, commends Cllr O’Grady for raising this issue. Shares his concerns in relation to the supply of housing. We had a presentation recently from the CIF in the Development Committee meeting. There was general agreement that this problem is going to get worse before it gets better. Should the task force be a county or a national task force? Many of the problems are national problems and they require an approach from government. E.g. mortgage rules, finance, the cost of building. Developers are saying it is not viable for them to build outside of Dublin. Supports any initiative which helps to improve this position. But points out that many of the issues are outside the control of this Council.

Cllr Carroll (FF): It is high time a task force was put together to deal with this. There will be a crisis in our housing. Has concerns about NARPS and properties in housing estates being handed over for social housing. Not fair to those who bought houses in those estates at expensive prices. They must have consideration for those who invested their money as well.

Cllr Dawson (FG): Young couples are not qualifying for the social housing list, but they cannot borrow money. These are a lost group that we need to be looking at.

Cllr Mullane (SF): Does not feel that people in social housing detract from a location. Wants Cllr Carroll to retract what he said about people’s properties being devalued if social housing is brought into an estate. There is an issue like this in Mallow at present which is stopping people from getting social housing. Will not accept this attitude from elected reps.

CE: We are making progres with the targets that have been set. The shortage of supply from the private housing sector is creating difficulty. The issue is across the county, not just in Metropolitan Cork. Cork County Council has led the way here in terms of its analysis of the challenge. The Dublin Housing Supply Task Force did an analysis of the challenges facing Dublin. We did a similar analysis and it has been recognised nationally by the Department and NAMA as being as robust as any analysis done on the Dublin challenge. In fact, ours is probably more in-depth. The outcome of that is that in a recent government announcement, Cork has been referenced in the Dublin support package. No other urban centre has. Cork will be treated the same way as Dublin if there is a government package to come to tackle this problem. We have met DoELG, NAMA, NTA, TII, IW (workshops even with the agencies) over the last year to outline the challenges and to get all the ducks lined up. There must be careful alignment of programmes to ensure various tracts of land can be brought to the market. There is fragmented ownership of the masterplan sites and yes, this is a challenge. The public infrastructure is indeed a challenge. It is important to point out that the CIF is at the table with us on a quarterly basis. The CIF fully concurred with what we have analysed. They concur that the land we have zoned is the most suitable for zoning. They also agree that if these lands do not take off, it will be very difficult to find equally good alternatives. There is a major challenge. We need alignment of the infrastructure agencies. But the level of investment from those agencies is actually quite small. We estimate that €7- 8m of investment in different elements of public infastructure is needed in Cork to ensure that the lands we have are opened up in the next 2 – 3 years.

Cllr O’Grady (SF): Thanks the CE for his comments and wasn’t criticising the Council with the motion. The task force would have to be a national body. Lists the people one would need on it. Such a task force is something we have been discussing at SPC level. The CIF gave the impression that whilst lands are zoned in the county, they are not zoned in viable areas. The reality is we are 2 years behind Dublin if the government are now recognising that Cork also needs housing urgently. For example, the 20k new homes for construction announced by NAMA are all to be built in Dublin. Anything that helps us catch up would be great.

CE: At a social housing level, we have a joint oversight group between City and County which is attended now and again by the DoELG and various housing bodies. This helps all understand what is going on in relation to the social housing market. On receivers: we could come back in the new year and given an update on this. Discussions are ongoing with banks and liquidators and we will clarify in due course. We are making good progress.

 

(4 FF, 9 FG, 6 Ind, 4 SF present)

 

Suspension of standing orders

Cllr O’Keeffe (FF): We are coming out of climate agreement talks in Paris where we have agreed to a less than 2% reduction in temperature increase worldwide. We spoke of floods a little while ago. Is concerned that whatever measures we agree as a country will not have a major impact on agricultural production. Hopes agriculture will drive on ahead. It is a major contributor to our economy. We need to acknowledge the part the government played in signing this. This is hugely important from now on and what happens on the ground.

Cllr Hayes (SF): There was a very serious debate on this over the weekend. It will have serious implications for the farming industry. Spoke of new social houses bieng built in Clonakilty. We were querying the heating aspect of the houses in the West Cork Municipal District meeting. They are to be heated by oil but because they have no side gate, the hose from the oil truck is to come in the front door and out the back door. What plans do the Council have to look into less dependence on fossil fuels for our own houses going forward?

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): The outcome of the Paris talks is better than what could have been but a lot less than what should have been. Agriculture and transport are major areas we have to tackle. Insulation, etc. is the best way of reducing domestic emissions. In a report published this morning, 82,200 people in Cork County alone suffering from fuel deprivation. Believes that much of this comes from lack of insulation.

Cllr McGrath (FF): Agrees that the outcome of the Paris talks are meaningful and will inevitably impact on agriculture. Supports what Cllr O’Laoghaire says about insulation.

Cllr Murphy (FG): Agrees with Cllr O’Keeffe

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): The real test for Ireland in the aftermath of the Paris talks will be the agreement that must now be debated with the rest of Europe on burden sharing. So often Ireland goes into these debates playing the poor mouth. But we have no business doing that any more. We are not special. Our economy is growing at the same rate and in some cases faster than other European countries. The measures necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must become part and parcel of every aspect of what we do from now on. With regard to agriculture, we had a presentation last year made to a meeting of the Development Committee on the opportunity for increasing dairy production. I pointed out at that meeting that cows poo and unless we want to deal with the increased impact of their methane emissions, we will have to take measures to manage their slurry. I haven’t heard one word to advance that since. We must build more efficiently, to better standards. Yet Minister Alan Kelly is proposing to amend the building regulations to lower apartment standards. And on transport, the Port of Cork was granted planning permission last year to build a major port facility in Ringaskiddy. This will relegate all port goods to road transport for ever more. There will never be a rail line to Ringaskiddy. Yet An Bord Pleanala granted that planning permission without any assesssment of the impact on climate from that proposal. So the measures to achieve greenhouse gas emissions must become part of everything that we do such that they are as natural as breathing.

Cllr O’Keeffe: Thanks all who have contributed. Thinks Cllr D’Alton has hit the nail on the head with regard to controlling emissions from agriculture.

 

18.  Councillor Seamus McGrath:
“To seek a report outlining the number of Litter Wardens employed in each Division of Cork County Council.  Given the ongoing and widespread problem of illegal dumping and littering, to request that additional Litter Wardens be appointed across Cork County. “

Report: Response to McGrath’s motion on litter wardens

Cllr McGrath (FF): This is a battle we are not winning and that requires more resources. Thanks for the report received from the executive. We have three full time wardens in the county. There is a shortage of resources being applied to this issue. If one of these wardens is on leave, there is no warden operating in that division. It is a very serious issue that we as an authority would leave such a serious issue unmonitored. We are not doing enough in relation to enforcement. We are not preventing the problem from happening. The report has thrown up some nomalies. Midleton, for example, has 3 part-time wardens. Other large towns have no part-time wardens and even no full-time warden at some given times. This is an urgent issue. Had hoped that the Civic Amenity Sites redeployment of staff would produce additional staff resources for the enforcement side of litter control, but no, they have been redeployed to the reactive side.

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Seconds the motion and cannot support it strongly enough. There is tremendous need for additional litter wardens, particularly in South Cork. Litter wardens can help to raise awareness of the litter issue which has not just a negative visual and social impact but will also ultimately detract from commercial life in our towns. There are many downstream benefits from improved control of this problem.

Cllr Forde (FF): Supports the motion. People ask what is the property tax doing for me? If we can say the grass is being cut, the trees are being topped, the litter is being collected, footpaths are being installed and lighting is sufficient, then people know they are getting value for money. That is what local government is all about. Please, let the CE focus on that question when he is deciding where to put extra staff or resources.

CE: We will be advertising in the early New Year to ensure the situation in South Cork is remedied. We are trying to increase part-time wardens. There may be other opportunities for us to do more in this area. The public is aware of the scourge of litter. Those who litter are extremely difficult to catch.

Cllr McGrath (FF): Thanks. Wants to keep this on the agenda. Remedying the South Cork issue is one thing but there needs to be greater addressing of this issue across the county.

 

19.  Councillor Deirdre Forde:
“That this Local Authority welcomes increased Government investment of €5 million in policing to tackle burglaries and related crime and calls on the Garda Commissioner to ensure that Cork is prioritised in her spend.”

Cllr Forde (FG): Please give us a chance to contact the Minister directly in relation to getting new gardai for Cork. Thinks this Minister for Justice will be one of the most pivotal for many years given that there is so much money now available for more garda recruits. Spoke of money being spent on garda cars. Very important for local communities that tbey would have confidence in the gardai. Wants us to write to the Commissioner and ask that these new recruits would be placed in Cork. Very reassuring for people to see gardai taken away from desk jobs and put out in the communities.

Cllr Collins (FG): Supports the motion. There are assets that are being used in stations where 1,000 gardai are doing work when they should be out in the open doing policing work. Very pleased to second the motion.

Cllr O’Donnabhain (FF): Welcomes the motion and the increased investment in policing. Although there has been recruitment, the bulk of the resources appear to be directed towards Dublin. €5m is a drop in the ocean in relation to what is required. Garda resources are very thin on the ground. What must be happening in the county areas when the impact of insufficient gardai in the city is so obvious? Millions were found to build a courthouse in the city centre which no elected official called for yet people on the ground in rural areas are terrified. Last Friday, a judge pointed out the breakdown in confidence in the criminal justice system.  The strategy of the government in that investment must be examined.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): Supports the motion. Togher/Gurranebraher has been very badly hit by reduced garda presence. Commends the gardai who have had succes in recent months but more investment is needed.

Cllr Harris (Ind): Welcomes the motion. Morale among the gardai is not great. Income is very low. We hear of some gardai sleeping in their cars when they go to training sessions. The focus of the money and the best way to spend it is important.

Cllr Forde (FG): Thanks Members. Confirms that letter will go to the Garda Commissioner.

 

20.  Councillor Kevin O’Keeffe:
“That Cork County Council calls on the Government to ensure that Irish Water does not renege on the Service Level Agreement already in place for its workforce. This is to guarantee there will be no immediate redundancies of staff given the current deficiencies in the existing water and sewerage infrastructure.”

 Cllr O’Keeffe (FF): The workers who went to Irish Water were mostly from the county councils. Now their SLA is under threat. Wants the Chamber to support that Irish Water would support the workforce being kept in place.

Cllr G Murphy (FG): Doesn’t think the Council should be overconcerned about this issue. One of the flaws in Irish Water is the good job the City and County Managers did in negotating the SLA for their workforce. They wanted to make sure it would serve ex-Council workers into the future.

Cllr P O’Sullivan (FF): Disagrees with Cllr Murphy. If Irish Water workers are voting in favour of industrial action, their interests cannot have been catered for adequately. Irish Water proposed two months ago to go back on the SLAs. They don’t consult with the unions. They are steamrolling ahead with the privatisation of our water networks. All will be at the expense of local authority workers.

Cllr Harris (Ind): When Irish Water was set up, one of the pulls was that investors would come in and put money into the upgrading of the system. But investors don’t come in without a promise of money in return. This is a classic privatisation tactic.

We will write to the government and Irish Water in relation to the SLA.

 

21.  Councillor Marcia D’Alton:
“That a planning application to An Bord Pleanala made under the Strategic Infrastructure Act can be made no more than twice for the same nature of project on the same site.”

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Text of motion under separate post.

Cllr O’Laoghaire (SF): Supports the motion. Cllr D’Alton said it really well. The Strategic Infrastructure Act is angled against communities.

Cllr Conway (ind): Strategic Development Zones should be included as well because they have the same effect, the same outcome and the same expense to the ordinary person. This is the second time they have had to go through this in Monard. Twice is enough and more than enough for democracy.

Cllr McGrath (FF): Suports the spirit of the motion. Understands the frustration of communities fighting the same battle over and over again. Needs to change to some extent to level the playing field. Large companies can go back for second and third bites at the planning process. Supports the motion in what it is endeavouring to do. Concerned that developers will try to change the “nature of the project” to come around it. There is an unlevel playing field at the moment, especially with pre-planning consultation. This unlevel playing field extends across the whole whole planning area.

Cllr G Murphy (FG): Has no problem with the motion but has a problem is with the process. It takes too long. There should be a definite end ot the process. We were talking about climate change and the need to move things along fast. That will involve infrastructural changes. If we haven’t the processes whereby we can make decisions quickly, then were are not going to succeed. So we can’t have it both ways if we regard climate change as hugely urgent.

Cllr Buckley (SF): Wants to be associated with the motion and supports.

Cllr Forde (FG): Current system is a David and Goliath. The little person has to take on the big. Motion deserves support. Has many problems with An Bord Pleanala – we are too late to make submissions to the review of the Board. Thinks the Board should be overhauled completely. If there is a particular project that someone wants to take on, e.g. with the delivery of a school in her area where there are problems with site, would love to have a process similar to the SIA. But is not allowed under current planning law.

Cllr O’Keeffe (FF): Too much power has been taken from the local authority. Companies have to be given a fair opportunity. Compares it to private house. How would the private landowner feel if he could not try again and again for planning permission for a private house?

Cllr Harris (Ind): Supports. Articulated well.

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Thanks all for contributions and support. Particularly agrees with Cllr Forde about the need for a formal Council input to the review of An Bord Pleanala. Suggests that we might request permission to do this, even though the date for submission has passed. The consultation was in a pre-prepared form with specific questions. Understands and appreciates Cllrs Murphy and O’Keeffe’s concerns. Perhaps the restrictions on reapplying for planning several times should be hinged on the site. If planning is refused because of the unsuitability of a site, maybe this should be the reason developers should not be permitted repeated applications. But it is absolutely the case that applying for planning permission three times is simply too much for communities and very unfair.

We will write to the department.

 

22.  Councillor Ian Doyle:
“In view of the extreme weather experienced in Cork County recently, that Cork County Council through the municipal districts would undertake a comprehensive roadside drain and dyke clean-up. The poor condition of these drain and dykes is due to lack of maintenance following on the staff embargo in place for a number of years. As a consequence of this there is a devastating impact on the condition of the regional and local road network especially in rural areas.”

Cllr Doyle (FF): We have all seen the effect of heavy rainfall with our dykes completely full of water. This has happened since the man left the shovel. There had always been Cork County Council guys with a shovel and they kept the dykes low and drains clear.  Passed a road with a river of water running down it this morning. A single private owner was out with a shovel trying to avert the water.   He succeeded. You cannot beat the shovel. Knows funds are limited in the Municipal Districts. Knows staff are put to the pin of their collar to do what they do. But we spoke of putting money towards verge cutting. Can we do the same as an urgent proposal to keep dykes and drains clear?

Mayor: This is probably a discussion we need at Municipal District level. If we have 20 roads on our programme for 2016, it is important that we put money into a proper drainage programme for these roads.

CE: We’ll have the money we’ll have. We will know that in early January/late February. It will then be up to each Municipal District to decide how that fundiing should be allocated. If we need to increase roadside drainage, that impacts on our work programme too. It is a debate that needs to be taken at each Municipal District.

 

23.  Councillor Paul Hayes:
“That this Council explores the practical steps required to introduce water harvesting systems in its future social housing plans, in a bid to conserve treated water for drinking purposes, and reduce the cost to the state of treating mains water, much of which is used for cleaning and for flushing of toilets. Plans for private houses should also be encouraged to use water harvesting systems, the cost of which may be offset by a grant, similar to previous sustainable energy grants for installing solar panels on houses.”

Cllr Hayes (SF): There is an opportunity for Cork County Council to lead the way in this one. Last year, the government announced plans to include rainwater harvesting in building regulations. They then went down a different road in setting up Irish Water. We are on the cusp of a housebuilding scheme in Clonakilty. We can make these houses environmentally friendly, using cost efficient measures.

Cllr Doyle (FF): In Fermoy Municipal District, we had a display of rainwater harvesting. Very impressive. Much potential.

Cllr D’Alton (Ind): Just want to briefly support this motion. 55% of water we use in a domestic setting could be replaced by greywater. 85% of water used in commercial and industrial settings does not need to be fresh. This is a no-brainer. Tremendous motion.

CE: We will look at this for our future social housing stock. Also at issue is whether the department will be willing to fund.

Cllr Hayes: 45 houses are to be built in Clonakilty. Local experts are willing to speak to the Council and advise how rainwater harvesting could be incorporated in these houses.

 

 No further motions were taken. All others are deferred until after Christmas.

 

24.  Councillor Donnchadh Ó Laoghaire:
“That this Council requests that Transport Infrastructure Ireland come before the Council, to outline the Demand Management Study currently being undertaken by them on the N40, and to respond to reports recently following their meeting a committee of Cork City Council, that TII is considering tolling the road, and to discuss related matters.”

 

25.  Councillor Kevin Murphy:
“That Cork County Council seeks an immediate meeting with the Minister Kelly, Minister for the Environment and Local Government and Minister Coffey, Minister for State, to address the serious anomaly that has arisen in regard to the limits on County Council’s House Purchase and City House Purchase Scheme.”

 

26.  Councillor Noel Collins:
“That this Council call on the Minister for Justice, Equality & Law Reform to consider an early change in the Inheritance Tax Laws.”

 

27.  Councillor Aindrias Moynihan:
“That Cork County Council calls on the Minister for Social Protection to end the age discriminatory way the contributory pension levels are being calculated.”

  

[i]             CORRESPONDENCE FROM OTHER BODIES

30.  Office of Public Works:
Letter dated 13th November, 2015, regarding Display of Books of Draft Flood Maps.

Letter from OPW: Draft Flood Maps OPW

CE: 20th January – closing date. We will discuss these at the Development Meeting in January. They are on display in the foyer in County Hall. 

 

[j]             VOTES OF CONGRATULATIONS

31.  VOTES OF CONGRATULATIONS (if any)

Cllr M Hegarty: Lily de la Coeur – world champion kickboxer
Cllr O’Laoghaire: Ireland’s cross country women’s team in European championships
Cllr S McCarthy (FG) – Midleton U15 football team

 

32.  ANY OTHER BUSINESS

Cllr Doyle (FF): Had asked that we would give a civic reception to the Navy for their work in the Mediterranean. Where is that at now?

Meetings administrator: We have written to the Navy.

Cllr Keohane (Ind): Nash’s Boreen is to be reopened. Judge ruled that it should be opened to vehicular traffic. We have a six week window to counteract that measure. If this boreen is opened again, there will be death, serious injury and dumping. These were all the reasons the boreen was closed.

Mayor: We will refer this to the Cobh Municipal District.

Happy Christmas to all!

 

Submission to the Department of the Environment, Community & Local Government on the next round of River Basin Management Planning

WFD SWMI Consultation,
Water Quality Section,
Department of the Environment, Community & Local Government,
Newtown Road,
Wexford.

3rd December, 2015.

 

RE: Significant Water Management Issues in Ireland – Public Consultation

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for the opportunity to input into the preliminary consultation for the next cycle of River Basin Management Planning in Ireland.

I have read the Significant Water Management Issues in Ireland document in full. It identifies most of the primary issues affecting water quality in Ireland. The introduction of the Integrated Catchment Management Concept is welcome. I support it strongly as the only way by which good water quality management will be achieved. The increased focus on community involvement is long overdue and also very welcome.

However, like so many of our responses to European Directives in Ireland, the document is very strong on identifying targets to be achieved, problems to be tackled and not so strong on the ways in which we in Ireland must change our modus operandi by which to achieve these targets. But we will never hit the environmental targets we set with a “business as usual” approach.

 

  • Agriculture

One of the aims of Food Harvest 2020 is to increase milk production by 50% now that milk quotas have been abolished. Cork County Council has also spoken positively about the potential the rich grasslands of the county offer for massively increased dairy production. Significant Water Management mentions the difficulty of achieving the Water Framework Directive targets in the context of Food Harvest 2020. It does not dwell on this issue, other than to comment on how research work currently underway will identify better how agriculture impacts on water at a catchment level.

Whilst research is always valuable, we already know how agriculture impacts on water quality, both at the individual stream level and at catchment level. The fact is that to increase the numbers of cows is to increase the volume of slurry produced. It is to increase poaching along riverbanks where cattle get direct access to flowing water. It is to increase the need to intensify grassland management. There is no getting away from this and if we are to attempt Food Harvest 2020 with any cognisance of the Water Framework Directive, Ireland will need to invest heavily in farmer education, slurry treatment and guidelines to protect watercourses from direct access by cattle. It will also be necessary to build centralised biogas plants similar to those in Denmark and Germany for improved management of agricultural slurries. These could offer tremendous potential to rural communities but have never been incentivised in Ireland.

Incentives such as planting of riparian zones and the designation of buffer zones for water source protection are only ever offered to farmers availing of agri-environmental schemes. It is necessary to introduce them across the board. Most farmers are stewards of the countryside. With education and guidance, they will be happy to work towards achieving better water quality. But it is no longer good enough that such agri-related water quality measures are conducted only on farms participating in agri-environmental schemes.

 

  • Urban Wastewater Treatment Discharges

Irish Water is putting investment into several of the major wastewater treatment schemes without which Ireland continues to fail the requirements of the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive. The Cork Lower Harbour wastewater treatment plant is a stark example of a long-awaited wastewater treatment scheme which, when delivered, will end the discharge of significant volumes of raw sewerage.

However, the discussion of urban wastewater in the Sustainable Water Management Issues document does not link wastewater with land use policy. I believe this link is critical. We as a country need to carefully examine our policy of one-off house construction. In particular, we need to consider the impact on the environment of disparate house-building in rural areas. Haphazard siting of houses requires installation of a septic tank or biocycle unit. Treatment of wastewater in discrete units in this way is less effective, less efficient and more difficult to monitor than treatment of wastewater in a communal treatment plant. Planning houses in clusters rather than scattered or in a linear form along a country roadside would allow far greater control of domestic wastewater treatment and discharge.

We are also culpable at all planning levels of building on flood plains. Flood plains perform an essential riparian function. Not merely do they allow vast areas onto which a full river can spill. They also soak rainwater running towards a river, filtering sediment and other pollutants from it before it reaches the water. Yet because they have been constructed on, many floodplains in our larger towns are no longer available to perform this essential function. It is critical that the impact of building on floodplains would be acknowledged as being highly retrograde in terms of water quality.

 

  • Hazardous chemicals

Issue 13 discusses hazardous chemicals, particularly heavy metals and PAHs, in our watercourses. It is essential that endocrine disruptors would also be considered. These insidious chemicals strike at the heart of many of the most fundamental aspects of nature.

It is critical that we examine the source of these chemicals in our discharges to water.

One of the key contributors to hazardous chemicals in the water environment is urban wastewater. When wastewater is treated, much of the hazardous content is captured in the sludge. Irish government policy is for the beneficial use of sewage sludge (biosolids) in agriculture. Although the Code of Best Practice advises for the spreading of sludge at a rate which optimises the trapping of these hazardous compounds in soil, it is an indisputable fact that the sludge to land policy may permit levels of hazardous compounds in our agricultural environment to accumulate. The assimilative capacity of soil is limited and so, ultimately, these compounds will make their way to watercourses.

Ireland’s sludge to land policy was drawn up almost 20 years ago. It is well past time that it was revisited. In 2013, almost 24,000 tonnes of untreated sludge was landspread in Ireland. Septic tank sludges are regularly disposed of by landspreading. Research, technology and the microchemical composition of sewage sludge have all moved on. The Sustainable Water Management Issues document needs to identify this sludge policy as being in need of updating.

The Sustainable Water Management Issues document does not identify the link between industry and hazardous chemicals in our watercourses. Producer responsibility dictates that industry must take cognisance of the ingredients of cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, etc. It is time that Ireland focused on this link with a view to reducing the ongoing build-up of hazardous compounds such as these in our environment generally.

 

  • Road drainage

Runoff from roads is not mentioned at all in the Sustainable Water Management Issues document. Yet this is a significant source of water pollution. Rainwater running off our impervious urban surfaces contains petrol, oil, heavy metals and PAHs. Fertiliser use on golf courses and residential gardens increases the nutrient load of runoff. Runoff also raises the temperature of smaller water bodies, often with adverse effects on fish life.

Drainage in Ireland typically involves collecting as much stormwater as possible and removing it quickly to avoid flooding. But this approach not just maximises the direct introduction of these pollutants into surface water, it also causes flooding further downstream.

There are many best practice methods by which road drainage and stormwater generally can be more effectively managed. Many local level policy changes can make a real difference. These include incentives towards the installation of green roofs, the development of neighbourhood-constructed wetlands, bioretention systems and infiltration basins.

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems need to become the norm rather than the exception in Ireland if we are to combat the unsustainable effects of our “collect and dispose” method of stormwater management.

 

  • Determination and the allocation of resources

The very first issue listed for consideration in the Sustainable Water Management Issues document is affordability. If the starting point towards achieving any targets is what we cannot afford, then we will never achieve those targets.

The hesitancy of the “Can we really do it?” ethos is reflected throughout the document. Thus the document lacks determination, punch and the will to succeed. It is essential that resources are dedicated to achieving compliance with the Water Framework Directive. It is essential that if additional tasks are to be undertaken by local authorities, they would be adequately staffed and financed. It is essential that all community stakeholders buy into achieving Ireland’s targets under the Water Framework Directive.

But equally and perhaps more important is that the same level of buy-in is committed to by both industry and the government. Industry is the source of much of the cyclical and difficult to treat compounds found in Ireland’s rivers and lakes. Policies and strategies of other governmental departments have the potential to significantly impact on achieving the targets of the Water Framework Directive. It is not sufficient to address achieving these targets in an integrated way merely at catchment level. A multi-sectoral, cross-departmental approach is also essential.

Yours faithfully,

______________________________________

Marcia D’Alton, B.E., M.Eng,Sc.,
Independent Member, Cork County Council

Submission to the National Roads Design Office on the Carr’s Hill Interchange proposal

Project Engineer,
M28 Cork to Ringaskiddy Motorway Scheme,
Cork National Roads Office,
Richmond,
Glanmire,
Co. Cork.

29th November, 2015.

 

RE: Proposed Carr’s Hill Interchange and associated works

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to proposals for a new interchange at Carr’s Hill to facilitate the anticipated upgrade of the existing N28 to motorway status.

The N28 connects the Strategic Employment Area of Ringaskiddy to Cork City and beyond. As of An Bord Pleanala’s decision last year to grant planning permission to the Port of Cork for relocation and construction of new facilities at Ringaskiddy, the N28 will also need to connect port traffic to the rest of the country. This is a significant ask for a road that is already suffering extreme congestion. Much investment has gone into the Ringaskiddy cluster and both the relevant authorities and the local population put tremendous store by what Ringaskiddy can deliver for employment and the economy generally. There is widespread support for upgrading the N28 such that it may ease current traffic congestion and help Ringaskiddy to become more efficient in every way.

Despite this widespread support for the upgrade of the N28, the current proposals for the Carr’s Hill Interchange and associated works have engendered an unprecedented level of concern. Socio-economically, the local population is dominated by working families who are well educated and who contribute significantly to the local economy. They are busy people who devote the majority of their lives to their children, their work and to the commuting associated with both. Typically, these people simply do not have the time to engage in public consultations.

There is a clear message being delivered to the Cork National Roads Office when these people, in their hundreds, have expressed their massive concern about the Carr’s Hill Interchange proposals. These are people who live in the N28 corridor and who have an incomparable level of familiarity with the regional and local roads within the N28 corridor. They use those roads every day, at all times of the day. They use them for school deliveries, for getting to work, for shopping, for going to church, for calling to friends. With the single exception of the Greenway along the former railway line connecting Passage West to Cork City, the regional and local roads in the N28 Corridor are notably devoid of cycling infrastructure. The pattern of development is too linear to facilitate easy walking. Housing in and around Rochestown in particular is on steep hills. Local facilities are few and far between. Those that are available are generally at the bottom of these hills. It follows that, of necessity, these people are highly car-dependent.

This is one of the primary reasons that extreme congestion is not seen just on the N28. It is seen throughout the N28 corridor. Those who live with and negotiate that congestion every day are those most qualified to voice opinions on the proposed Carr’s Hill Interchange and associated works. I concur strongly with all of their concerns.

  

  • Inadequate size of roundabout at Maryborough Ridge

One key element of the Carr’s Hill Interchange proposals is the closure of the Mount Oval and Maryborough Hill slip roads. The Cork National Roads Office advises us that these slip roads are not to motorway standard. It is proposed that the thousands of commuters who use these roads every day will instead use the new Carr’s Hill Interchange. This means that Mount Oval residents would come out of Mount Oval, turn right, go up Garryduff and turn right down onto the new roundabout at Maryborough Ridge. Maryborough Hill residents would come up the hill to use the Maryborough Ridge roundabout. Carrigaline, Passage West and Monkstown residents who currently travel up Moneygourney to access the Maryborough Hill slip road would use the Maryborough Ridge roundabout instead. Many Douglas residents choose not to sit in the congested mess that is Douglas village traffic every morning and access the N40 by the Maryborough Hill slip road. It is simply not possible for the roundabout at Maryborough Ridge to accommodate this level of commuting traffic at peak. The roundabout is too small. It was not designed for this. The approach roads are too narrow. Neither the roundabout nor Maryborough Hill will ever accommodate more than one lane of traffic. The Carr’s Hill Interchange proposal falls at this very first hurdle. The Maryborough Ridge roundabout and its approach roads are too small.

 

  • Unacceptable volume of traffic through Maryborough Ridge

To drive all this traffic through Maryborough Ridge is extremely unfair. Maryborough Ridge is a residential estate. It was always planned that a distributor road connecting Maryborough Hill to the N28 would run through it. But even the proposal for that distributor road generated concern when the development was at planning stage:

The proposed through road will become a link road serving the N28 and will result in large volumes of traffic travelling through a built up area at high speed ad will cause segregation of the overall estate into the future. Also such a proposal endangers users of the open green areas adjoining and pedestrians wishing to cross the through road.”

These were the comments of the Assistant Area Engineer of Cork County Council in April, 2004 when the construction of Maryborough Ridge was being considered by Cork County Council. These were concerns expressed about envisaged local commuter traffic even when there were other existing local alternatives by which the local traffic could access the N28. It is incomparable to what is proposed now by the Cork National Roads Design Office. The levels of risk to residents, noise and air pollution are incomparable. It is entirely unsustainable to propose bringing this level of traffic through a residential estate.

 

  • Closure of the Mount Oval slip road is unacceptable

The proposed closure of the Mount Oval slip road is unacceptable. The reason it is unacceptable is simple: the development of 800 houses at Mount Oval would not have been approved by the planning authority without the existence of that slip road. The road through Foxwood was always intended as a distributor road to the N28 and was shown as such in a 1999 variation of the 1996 County Development Plan. This variation was prompted by the Bacon Report. It signalled an acceptance of higher density development for suitable sites and made specific proposals for improved road access to lands that were accepting higher density development. The Mount Oval development was considered to be one such parcel of land.

In his comments in February 2000 on the planning application for Mount Oval, the Chief Planning Officer of Cork County Council said that: “This spine of distributor roads will facilitate traffic movement in the area with the off-ramp access from Sli Charrig Dhonn providing an alternative to the local road network. The connection through Foxwood … comprises an integral part of the original estate layout – the section of road through Foxwood has no frontage development and has obviously been designed to link into the spine/distributor road system.

The use of the word “integral” is highly relevant.

It was again reflected in the comments of the An Bord Pleanala planning inspector: “The construction of the spine road, while it will facilitate traffic management in the wider area, is an essential element of this development”.

The planning application for high density development in Mount Oval would have been looked at in an entirely different light were the spine road with off-ramp access to the N28 not available. This is because it was widely acknowledged by developers and both planning authorities that the local roads were in need of essential upgrading. It is 16 years since the first major planning application for Mount Oval was lodged. In all this time, with the exception of the short stretch from Garryduff to Maryborough Hill those local roads have not been upgraded in any way. But traffic has increased significantly in that time. So dependence on the Mount Oval slip road is greater than was ever envisaged. Frankly, the Roads Design Office has no authority to propose closure of a road that was deemed essential to permitting high density development. It would be far more appropriate were the plans for the upgrading of the N28 to incorporate proposals to develop the long-promised on-ramp to Mount Oval rather than to eliminate the existing essential off-ramp.

 

  • Congestion and inadequacy of local roads around Mount Oval

Because the roundabout at Maryborough Ridge would suffer intolerable congestion and because the journey to that roundabout would increase commuting trips by several kilometres, it is inevitable that local traffic would divert to the Rochestown Road. Mount Oval residents will come down Clarke’s Hill or Coach Hill to access the N28 via the on-ramp at the Rochestown roundabout.

The R610 is already massively congested. In his frustration, one resident of Passage West videoed and timed his movement along the R610 in the morning peak. Typically, it took him 7 minutes to travel 900 metres. Delays are caused largely by the pinch point that is the Rochestown roundabout. Cork County Council attempted to improve through-flow by providing an extra lane onto the roundabout west-bound. This helped ease congestion for a while but has shown no capacity to keep pace with car use generally. Tailbacks every morning stretch from the Rochestown roundabout to Hop Island. The R610 cannot accommodate more traffic. Drivers of cars on the R610 always co-operate with traffic from Clarke’s Hill attempting to join the Rochestown roundabout queue. But to expect cars waiting at the bottom of Clarke’s Hill to turn right through that westbound stream of traffic without any visibility of what is coming on the eastbound lane is utterly unreasonable.

 

  • Inadequacy of right-hand turning lane at the bottom of Clarke’s Hill

It is equally unreasonable to offer a right-hand turning lane at the bottom of Clarke’s Hill as a solution to the increased number of cars that would leave the N28 at the Rochestown road off-ramp. It would be insufficient. This right-hand turning lane is needed already to ease the tailback in the evening peak to and through the Rochestown roundabout. This congestion in turn creates a tailback on the N28 off-ramp. It is not right that provision of this essential right-hand turning lane should be considered only in the context of the N28 upgrade.

 

There are additional issues for cars attempting to leave the N28 off-ramp to get onto the Rochestown roundabout. Visibility is appalling. It is impossible to see traffic coming from the Douglas direction until it comes past the bridge supports. If increased commuter traffic were to use the Rochestown off-ramp in an attempt to avoid the longer route associated with the proposed Carr’s Hill Interchange, it would be essential to improve visibility and safety at this location.

 

  • Clarke’s Hill and Coach Hill cannot accommodate additional traffic

Clarke’s Hill and Coach Hill cannot safely and sustainably their existing volume of traffic. This has not been acknowledged in any part of the proposals by the National Roads Design Office. In fact, Coach Hill has not even been mentioned. At present, Clarke’s Hill is so narrow that a bus and car cannot pass simultaneously at the bend at the top. The pinch point in the middle of Coach Hill is sufficiently wide for only one lane of traffic. Visibility at the bottom of Coach Hill is appalling, particularly for right-hand turning traffic. It is not a panacea to say that upgrades for both Clarke’s Hill and Coach Hill are at design stage. Upgrading of these roads has been planned since Mount Oval was granted planning permission. In the intervening 16 years, it still has not happened.

 

  • Increase in noise pollution

What about the residents of Wainsfort, Newlyn Vale and all those who already have heavy traffic in their back gardens? All those whose exposure to noise already keeps them awake at night? Many of these are people for whom an existing tolerable situation was made far worse by TII’s recent destruction of trees along the Bloomfield Interchange and N40. The National Roads Design Office proposals do not contain one reference to existing noise levels currently endured by adjacent residents. That these noise levels will be intensely augmented by the volume and nature of traffic proposed for the M28 is a fundamental consideration. It is not a defence to say that the project is simply at route selection stage; that these issues will be assessed as part of the Environmental Impact Statement for the overall project. These are issues about which people have tremendous concern. Yet when one resident of Wainsfort asked at the public briefing about proposals to provide noise screening to his property as part of the overall upgrading project, he understood from an RPS representative that the Wainsfort section of the N28 may be regarded as existing development rather than a new development and may therefore not even be subject to assessment as part of the Environmental Impact Statement. This is entirely unacceptable.

The proposed leading of all N28-bound local traffic through Maryborough Ridge would also create significant noise pollution for the residents of this estate. Again, it is not adequate to propose noise barriers along either side of the distributor road through the estate. Noise barriers have an unpleasant visual aspect and would cut residents on the south side of the road off from neighbours, play areas and facilities in the northern part of the estate.

 

  • Increase in air pollution

The M28 is to carry a significantly higher proportion of heavy vehicles than the existing N28. Port of Cork figures indicate that by 2033, there will be an overall increase of over 3,350 HGVs travelling to and from the Ringaskiddy port facilities each day. That excludes either further port or industrial development in Ringaskiddy.

 

Air pollutants from cars and trucks are found in higher concentrations near major roads. People who live, work or attend school near major roads have increased incidence and severity of asthma, cardiovascular disease, impaired lung development in children, pre-term and low-birthweight infants, childhood leukemia and premature death. Particles largely generated by diesel exhausts have been shown by recent research carried out in the Netherlands to cause problems at levels well below those stipulated in current EU air-quality directives. It found that for every increase of 5 µg/m3 in annual exposure to PM2.5, the risk of death for men rises by 7%.

Yet yet this proposal for the Carr’s Hill Interchange involves accommodating a massively increased number of HGVs on a road running particularly close to residential housing in Rochestown. It plans to concentrate all N28-bound local traffic through the Maryborough Ridge housing estate. The proposal from the National Roads Design Office does not even mention the new school campus to be provided for both primary and secondary school children in Maryborough Ridge. It is not acceptable that the risks from heavy traffic are not assimilated into the route selection stage of a proposal such as this. It is essential that the adverse effects of air pollution on vulnerable residents are minimised from the outset by good design. Only residual effects should be dealt with by mitigation.

 

 

  • Proposal fails to comply with government policy

At the most fundamental of levels, this proposal for the Carr’s Hill Interchange is wrong. In 2009, the government produced an 11-year policy document for the future of transport in Ireland. This policy document, Smarter Travel: A New Transport Policy for Ireland, outlines the actions that must be achieved across all sectors in society to achieve defined goals towards reduced emissions from transport and modal shift.

Through this policy document, the government promises society that “individual and collective quality of life will be enhanced. It commits to actions which will help to “reduce health risks and the incidence of accidents and fatalities”. Above all, the government pledges that “land use planning and the provision of transport infrastructure and services will be better integrated”.

Despite these commitments from government towards more sustainable transport, the key elements of the Carr’s Hill Interchange proposal are to:

  • Eliminate two key local access ramps to the N28
  • Replace the two key local access ramps with an interchange system comprising four roundabouts and a longer distance of several kilometres
  • Attempt to force all local commuting traffic to the one point of access to the N28
  • Bring all local commuting traffic through a residential estate.

The on-the-ground reality of these proposals would lead to:

  • Traffic diverting to an already over-congested regional road in an attempt to avoid the unwieldy proposed interchange
  • Increased levels of noise endured by a significantly larger number of residents
  • Increased levels of air pollution endured by a significantly larger number of residents
  • Increased traffic congestion on local roads causing increased commuting times, increased driver frustration and, in turn, increased emissions from crawling traffic.

Each one of these outcomes is contrary to the government’s policy as outlined in Smarter Travel. It is well understood that the purpose of TII is to provide national road infrastructure and services. But the N28 does not exist in a vacuum. There are 7,000 people working in Ringaskiddy. These people do not live on the N28. They must all make their way their way to work and school on regional and local roads connecting to the N28. If the provision of a faster, more efficient N28 impacts negatively on those regional and local roads, the only beneficiary will be HGVs travelling to and from the port. Longer travel times and more congestion impacts negatively on worker mentality, worker delivery and worker wellbeing.

TII would be justified in saying that regional and local roads are within the remit of the local authorities. But fundamentally, Smarter Travel commits to better integration of land use planning and the provision of transport infrastructure. The National Roads Design Office with its close links to both Cork County Council and TII would be in an ideal position to plan for an upgraded N28 whilst delivering improved options to daily commuters on an over-subscribed regional and local road network.

Sadly, the current proposals are diametrically opposed to the Smarter Travel aims and make a mockery of the TII mission statement: to “contribute to the quality of life for the people of Ireland and support the country’s economic growth”. Certainly, it is important to facilitate industry and the port. But industry cannot function without the people that are the power behind the economic growth that industry is designed to drive.

 

Conclusion

The Carr’s Hill Interchange proposals are unacceptable. They would increase congestion on roads that would result in longer journey times for local commuters, thereby wasting time, generating stress, increasing sick days, diminishing family life, diminishing leisure time, fostering obesity and adding to noise and air pollution in established residential environments.

If an interchange is required for the M28, then it needs to increase commuter options, not eliminate them.

Traffic between Ringaskiddy and Cork City does not have to move fast; it simply has to move. I can see little logic in encouraging HGVs to hurtle into the Bloomfield Interchange only to be halted by a one-lane loop onto the N40 eastbound. Far safer to control their speed from further out. Some residents have suggested that if the motorway were to finish before the Maryborough Hill on-ramp, it would allow retention of the Maryborough Hill and Mount Oval slip roads. This appears to be a sensible option. It would allow HGV and other Ringaskiddy-related traffic the benefits of the motorway whilst retaining existing commuter routes for local traffic.

This proposal provides a once in a lifetime opportunity to sort out several long-standing problems in the road network in and around the Bloomfield Interchange:

  • Provision of the long planned Mount Oval on-ramp would reduce congestion on local roads and increase overall traffic efficiency for communities along the N28 corridor.
  • At present, traffic coming from the city and attempting to come off the N40 at the Rochestown off-ramp has to cross merging traffic coming from Mahon and the Jack Lynch Tunnel. Considerations to improving the safety of this treacherous manoeuvring would be very welcome.
  • As mentioned above, visibility at the bottom of the Rochestown off-ramp for traffic wanting to exit onto the R610 is very poor. This needs to be improved for increased safety.
  • Drivers attempting to exit from the Rochestown Church direction endure intolerably long delays whilst giving priority to traffic coming from Douglas and from the N40. Those enduring these delays several times each day deserve consideration as part of this project.

Please be open to the feedback received from all those so concerned about this Carr’s Hill Interchange proposal. It is not the right solution. There are better solutions which will encompass a wider range of needs and which will deliver far greater overall better value for money and quality of life.

Yours faithfully,

_____________________________________________

Marcia D’Alton, B.E., M.Eng.Sc.
Independent Member, Cork County Council.